Search for: "PRIME CONSTRUCTION, CORP."
Results 1 - 20
of 252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
The Department of Sanitation in 200 awarded a contract to Arnell Construction Corp. to build two new sanitation garages for Districts 1 and 4 located at 161 Varick Street in Brooklyn. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 8:23 am
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:15 am
See Alpha Data Corp. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:15 am
See Alpha Data Corp. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 10:08 am
At this point, however, there are more available Israeli subcontractors than there are American companies participating as primes, so the Corps is interested in generating more participation by American firms. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:57 am
Embed from Getty Images This is the second of a three-part series exploring the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in Zachry Construction Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:57 am
#148815118 / gettyimages.com This is the second of a three-part series exploring the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in Zachry Construction Corp. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:46 pm
Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:05 pm
The Corps has indicated that it intends to make maximum use of small businesses, either as prime contractors or subcontractors, in its stimulus program. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 12:11 pm
APRIL 27, 2009 - Nearly six years after her husband was killed in a construction accident at the Prime Tanning plant in Hartland, Maine, a woman has won a settlemant against Crown Equipment Corp., based out of Ohio. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 4:04 am
Four other female employees of Danella Construction Corp., also claimed that they were discriminated against because of gender, split an additional $50,000. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 11:31 am
Burke Corp. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 6:27 am
Image by skeeze via pixabay.com This is the third of a three-part series exploring the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in Zachry Construction Corp. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 6:27 am
Image by skeeze via pixabay.com This is the third of a three-part series exploring the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in Zachry Construction Corp. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 7:50 am
On April 24, the Department of Justice announced that Georgia-based Energy & Process Corp. had agreed to pay $4.6 million to settle civil allegations, initially brought by a whistleblower, that the company submitted false claims for payment on a construction contract in which the company had failed to meet quality standards and provided defective rebar. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 7:50 am
On April 24, the Department of Justice announced that Georgia-based Energy & Process Corp. had agreed to pay $4.6 million to settle civil allegations, initially brought by a whistleblower, that the company submitted false claims for payment on a construction contract in which the company had failed to meet quality standards and provided defective rebar. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 1:07 pm
Design Basics, LLC, Plan Pros, Inc. and Prime Designs, all of Omaha, Nebraska, filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Kerstiens Homes & Designs, Inc., T-Kerstiens Homes Corp., Kerstiens Realty, Inc., Kerstiens Management Corp., Kerstiens Leasing Corp., Kerstiens Holding Corp., and Kerstiens Development Inc. infringed multiple copyrights of the Plaintiffs. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 11:13 am
Interestingly, the Department of Energy (DOE) stressed the desire for more competition for its contracts and hopes that more contractors get involved in and bid on their capital construction projects (as primes, JV partners, or subcontractors), especially traditional construction contractors, as DOE’s projects require conventional construction services as well. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:33 am
In a long-awaited decision, the Federal Circuit ruled en banc to uphold the the de novo standard for appellate review of claim construction issues, which was previously established in another en banc decision, Cybor Corp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 9:50 am
Prime contractors providing general construction services cannot pay more than 85% of the amount paid by the government to firms that are not similarly situated. 13 C.F.R. [read post]
