Search for: "Pacific Telesis Group"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm
Pacific Telesis Group, __ Cal. 4th __ (2010), that Labor Code section 233 does not apply to paid sick leave policies that provide for an uncapped number of compensated days off.Section 233 provides, in relevant part, that an employee may use up to ½ of the employee’s accrued compensated sick leave to care for a family member:Any employer who provides sick leave for employees shall permit an employee to use in any calendar year the employee's accrued and… [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:01 pm
Pacific Telesis Group. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:07 pm
Pacific Telesis Group (2008) 163 Cal.App.4th 176 (Supreme Court case no S164692). [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:00 pm
Pacific Telesis Group (2008) __ Cal.4th __, the question was whether section 233's requirement that employers allow their employees to use "sick leave" to attend to an illness of a child, parent, spouse, or domestic partner, applies not only to traditional sick leave policies, but also to a "sickness absence" policy under which employees earn the use of five-day increments of compensated leave in the event of illness or injury, subject… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 3:34 am
Pacific Telesis Group here. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:16 pm
Pacific Telesis Group, the California Supreme Court ruled that Labor Code Section 233 does not apply where the employer's sick leave policy provides for an uncapped number of paid sick days. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 8:35 am
Pacific Telesis Group, --- Cal.Rptr.3d ----, 2010 WL 547321 (February 18, 2010), two employees brought a putative class action, seeking a determination that Cal. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:48 am
Telesis Group (S164692, February 18, 2010), was Pacific Bell's "sickness absence" policy that provided an unlimited amount of sick leave, pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:15 am
Pacific Telesis Group, the California Supreme Court held unanimously that Labor Code Section 233, which permits an employee to use a portion of accrued paid sick leave to care for ill relatives or for a domestic partner, does not apply to employer paid sick leave policies that (1) do not permit employees to accrue or "bank" paid sick leave or that (2) provide as a practical matter an unlimited number of paid sick leave days.The sick leave policy at issue in the… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:51 am
Pacific Bell Telesis Group et al., 2010 DJDAR 2487, the plaintiffs alleged that the employer violated Labor Code § 233 by failing to provide paid sick leave to employees caring for sick relatives. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:02 pm
Pacific Telesis Group, interpreting California Labor Code section 233, or California's so-called "Kin Care" law. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:34 am
Pacific Telesis Group, the California Supreme Court clarified the scope of California Labor Code § 233, California’s “kin care” law. [read post]
