Search for: "Padilla v. American Federation" Results 41 - 60 of 111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2016, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
Alejandro Garcia Padilla blasted a legal opinion on his island’s political status that the Obama administration filed” in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am by Thomas Hopson
Padilla, and Rasul v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
The panel explored the historical role women have played in the development of American law and discussed the role of women within the federal judiciary, as well as addressing the development of law related to sex equality. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
-M.Th.D. ten Napel,  Leiden Law School, Institute for Public Law, Section of Constitutional and Administrative Law, The Netherlands, “Religious Pluralism, Eastern Ethnical Monism and Western ‘Civic Totalism’” Nicolae V. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am by Robert Chesney
Jose Padilla was an American citizen who went abroad to join the jihad movement prior to 9/11. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-8543, that concerns the retroactive application of Padilla v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:32 am by Steve Vladeck
Vladeck is Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Scholarship at American University Washington College of Law. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:15 am by Cormac Early
” Campaign finance is also back in the news, with the Court scheduled to consider American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am by Dan Markel
Ryan (Southern Methodist University)   Criminal Justice 09: Criminal Law Stories Time: Fri, Jun 8 - 2:30pm - 4:15pm Place: HHV, TBA20  Session Participants: Chair: Donna Coker (University of Miami) The Story of Wanrow: Reasonableness, Gender, and Self-Defense *Donna Coker (University of Miami) Accomplice Liability and the Murderous Judge *Leo Katz (University of Pennsylvania) Robinson v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:40 am by Lovechilde
Supreme Court's decision last year, in Ashcroft v. [read post]