Search for: "Page v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2016, 7:51 am
Colvin: Social Security Disability Appeals appeared first on Massachusetts Social Security Disability Lawyers Blog. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:42 am
Recently, the Social Security Administration (SSA) issued a new version of SSA Publication 05-10029, its pamphlet titled Disability Benefits. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:18 pm
If you would like to see statistics on how frequently certain Administrative Law Judges allow or deny claims, the Social Security Administration's website has added a page as part of its Open Government initiative to give you that information. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:23 am
Although a knowledgeable attorney can provide you with answers to questions about your particular case, the Social Security Administration has a very informative website that can provide many general answers to questions about Social Security Disability. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
See, for example, Cook v City of Utica, 88 NY2d 833 and Bett v City of Lackawanna et al.,76 NY2d 900.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_00782.htm _________________ The Disability Benefits E-book: - This 810 page e-book focuses on disability leaves and benefits available to officers and employees in public service pursuant to Civil Service Law §§71, 72 and 73, General Municipal Law §207-a and… [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:44 am
Source: Federal Register, Vol. 74, No. 22, Page 6080.Copyright (c) 2008 by John V. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:51 am
In an April 2011 transmittal the Social Security Administration has announced that after a four year hiatus that it has resumed sending no-match letters to employers. [read post]
27 May 2016, 11:22 am
In Smith, claimant applied for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits, and the Social Security Administration (SSA) denied her application. [read post]
27 May 2016, 6:50 am
(See a list and short description of some of the main programs authorized by the Social Security Act, taking up 6 pages in Adinolfi v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:56 pm
Rodriquez in limbo by failing to respond to his request for administrative review.The judge devotes almost a page of her decision to suggestions about how SSA might appropriately satisfy its statutory obligations to Mr. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 7:49 am
Still, we have written before about the backlog of claims, which has been a time-honored, money-saving tactic of the Social Security Administration. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 7:21 pm
Astrue (ND Ind., Cherry, Magistrate Judge), 20-page opinion, Judge Ripple writes:Charles Getch appeals the order of the district court upholding the Social Security Administration's denial of his application for Disability Insurance Benefits. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am
The executive branch believes that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) does not apply to otherwise-authorized, military cyber activity, and the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision on the CFAA in Van Buren v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:29 am
Furthermore, Social Security's medical-vocational guidelines (which were found to be constitutional in Heckler v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:29 pm
In early 2012, a legal challenge arose - Hall v Sebelius - over this double-secret Social Security rule. [read post]
17 May 2018, 12:37 pm
Confidential personally identifying information (such as social security numbers) or revenge porn: Google has no legal obligation to deindex pages containing such material, but it voluntarily does so, again based on just the objector's request. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 5:53 am
Berryhill (D.D.C.) -- determining that plaintiff failed to rebut Social Security Administration’s claim that it never received his undated and unsigned request for records concerning himself, and that his subsequent Privacy Act claim for the same records failed to provide information about himself required by agency policies. [read post]
13 May 2007, 7:36 pm
Does the Social Security Administration help out by reminding of this legal hurdle, perhaps under its FAQ? [read post]
