Search for: "Page v. Social Security Administration"
Results 41 - 60
of 618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2021, 8:04 pm
Justice Steward continues: the mere act of posting by a Facebook page administrator is unlikely to justify, in and of itself, the factual conclusion that the administrator has thereby participated in the pu [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:16 pm
From today's order and accompanying opinion in Murthy v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:37 pm
You now get the opportunity to present your case formally to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) who will apply Social Security law and regulations to issue a multi-page written decision on your claim, subject to even further legal appeals. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's opinion noted that the Medical Board's determination conflicted with the finding of the Social Security Administration that awarded Petitioner disability benefits and Petitioner acknowledged "the finding of the Social Security Administration is not binding on the Medical Board [see Matter of Fusco, 136 AD3d at 451]". [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's opinion noted that the Medical Board's determination conflicted with the finding of the Social Security Administration that awarded Petitioner disability benefits and Petitioner acknowledged "the finding of the Social Security Administration is not binding on the Medical Board [see Matter of Fusco, 136 AD3d at 451]". [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 12:13 pm
Most commentary on Kavanaugh’s nomination has focused on what this shift may entail for a variety of domestic policies and social issues that are likely to come before the court, such as abortion and the scope of the administrative state. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
A correction officer [Plaintiff] for a county sheriff's department [Employer] filed an application for service retirement benefits under a special retirement plan set out in §89-f of the Retirement and Social Security Law claiming creditable service for a period that included the period from December 10, 1990 to February 19, 2016. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
A correction officer [Plaintiff] for a county sheriff's department [Employer] filed an application for service retirement benefits under a special retirement plan set out in §89-f of the Retirement and Social Security Law claiming creditable service for a period that included the period from December 10, 1990 to February 19, 2016. [read post]
30 May 2012, 2:56 pm
In Salas v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:16 am
CareFlite * Accessing an Employee’s Facebook Posts by “Shoulder Surfing” a Coworker’s Page States Privacy Claim — Ehling v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
An administrative hearing officer concluded that the incidents giving rise to the City’s application did not constitute accidents within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law [RSSL] and denied its application. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 12:19 pm
Thus, businesses should promptly implement security measures targeted to address specific shortcomings posed by increased use of remote work technology and social media. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 10:16 am
Consistent with this important practice, the Department is defending the constitutionality of the Social Security Act provision in this case. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:55 pm
Put in place practical security measures for employees who have been approved to administrate/operate blogs and social media pages. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
That broadening has made it possible to offer the course not just to first year law students, but also to graduate students in the social sciences and in international affairs, as a grounding in the legal systems that are important in their respective fields. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Supreme Court ordered the records in question produced for an in camera* inspection by the court and subsequently directed DOE to disclose the investigative file concerning “Office of Special Investigation Case 08-4247” except for certain pages, with any Social Security numbers redacted from such files. [read post]
14 May 2019, 2:55 am
This is due to the somewhat complicated interplay between New Jersey’s workers’ compensation laws and the Federal Social Security Act. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 4:38 am
Francis Xavier v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am
Anyone who understands anything about security knows that national security justifications are yet another flat-out lie from the Trump administration. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 6:25 am
The recent criminal case of R. v. [read post]
