Search for: "Pam Samuelson" Results 61 - 80 of 143
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2015, 9:05 am by Valarie Kaur
” The letter’s signatories include leading network neutrality experts Lawrence Lessig (Harvard), Barbara van Schewick (Stanford), and Tim Wu (Columbia), former FCC Chief Economist and former Director of the Bureau of Economics at the FTC Jonathan Baker (American University Washington College of Law), leading economist on network neutrality Nicholas Economides (NYU), leading first amendment experts and cyberlaw scholars Jack Balkin (Yale), Yochai Benkler (Harvard) and Pam… [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:05 am by Valarie Kaur
” The letter’s signatories include leading network neutrality experts Lawrence Lessig (Harvard), Barbara van Schewick (Stanford), and Tim Wu (Columbia), former FCC Chief Economist and former Director of the Bureau of Economics at the FTC Jonathan Baker (American University Washington College of Law), leading first amendment experts and cyberlaw scholars Jack Balkin (Yale), Yochai Benkler (Harvard) and Pam Samuelson (UC Berkeley), leading scholars of entrepreneurship and… [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:05 am by Valarie Kaur
” The letter’s signatories include leading network neutrality experts Lawrence Lessig (Harvard), Barbara van Schewick (Stanford), and Tim Wu (Columbia), former FCC Chief Economist and former Director of the Bureau of Economics at the FTC Jonathan Baker (American University Washington College of Law), leading economist on network neutrality Nicholas Economides (NYU), leading first amendment experts and cyberlaw scholars Jack Balkin (Yale), Yochai Benkler (Harvard) and Pam… [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Maira Sutton
Michael, Yale Law School Pam Samuelson, Berkeley Law School Susan Sell, George Washington U niversity Sean Flynn, American University David Levine, Princeton University 1. http://ec.europa.eu/news/2014/docs/c_2014_9052_en.pdf Related Issues: Fair Use and Intellectual Property: Defending the BalanceInternationalTrans-Pacific Partnership AgreementShare this:   ||  Join EFF [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 10:37 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
The authors have already made numerous changes to their paper in response to earlier comments from Sichelman, and it will be interesting to see how this debate evolves.Disentangling Behavioral Causes of the Anticommons Dilemma for Risky and Non-Risky Goods: Strategic Incentives, Endowment Effects, and Interdependence of Outcomes by Andreas Glöckner, Stephan Tontrup & Stefan Bechtold, with commentary by Pam Samuelson. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 10:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Improvements: Lemley suggests increasing the role of experts in improper appropriation test; Pam Samuelson suggested reversing the test and looking first for improper appropriation and then to copying.Heald: Laroche: mathematical approach to distance between a piece of music and an allegedly infringing piece—how many moves do you have to make to get from one to another. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:05 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
.; Samuelson, Pam; Sichelman, TedHigh Technology Entrepreneurs and the Patent System: Results of the 2008 Berkeley Patent Survey [article] 24 Berkeley Tech. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It’s been a good run since Campbell, but maybe the word transformative should be retired and talk about what we really mean, since different uses might not fit in the same bucket even though they are all nonsuperseding and productive—Pam Samuelson’s categorization attempts to group them. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:39 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  Instead, he just extrapolates based on gross exaggerations of some of the academic arguments made by Alliance board members, especially Professor Pam Samuelson. [read post]
17 May 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Buhl http://t.co/ZLmu1UweLm -> Federal, British Columbia and Alberta Privacy Commissioners Issue New Guidelines for Online Consent http://t.co/lraTgNtd6l -> RT @RobertBLevine_: Joining Pam Samuelson's Authors Alliance is like joining a union run by Wal-Mart management. [read post]
7 May 2014, 11:28 am by Deven Desai
And as Pam Samuelson and many others have noted, scholarly works pay off in reputation. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 6:51 am by Jason Rantanen
For instance, Berkeley’s Pam Samuelson is a world-renowned copyright expert and a winner of the “genius” grant from the John D. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 9:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
As numerous scholars such as Pam Samuelson, Mike Madison, and Matt Sag have shown, there are strong patterns in fair use cases on which reasonable people can rely. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  We don’t yet know, and that’s why we need a study.Lots of criticisms of these tests; Pam Samuelson & Mark Lemley prominent among them. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:54 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
The list of attendees included Mark Lemley, Amy Kapczynski, Yochai Benkler, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette, John Golden, Hannah Wiseman, Rebecca Eisenberg, Michael Abramowicz, Sean Pager, Jessica Silbey, Pam Samuelson, Barton Beebe, Ian Ayres, Brett Frischmann, Mark McKenna, Bryan Choi, Frank Pasquale, Tal Zarsky, Julie Cohen, Margot Kaminski, Michael Burstein, Bhaven Sampat, Brian Wright, Jonathan Masur, Dan Burk, Liza Vertinsky, Roger Ford, Sean O’Connor, Jim Bessen, Talha Syed,… [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
You know, for a judge who loves the First Amendment and free speech so much when it comes to the right of publicity and nominative fair use, Judge Kozinski can seem oddly unconcerned about it in other areas of IP, like dilution, secondary liability, and, here, copyright. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 3:30 am by Pam Samuelson
Pam Samuelson Sony’s Betamax was the first reprography technology to attract a copyright infringement lawsuit. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Christine Haight Farley, American University Washington College of LawSleeping Treaty: The Pan-American Trademark ConventionTTAB’s 2000 Belmont case: British-American Tobacco v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 5:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Courts have begun to understand that the internet isn’t what they first thought it was, and have declared various factors unimportant in various internet contexts, as the 10th Circuit does here, but what we need is a Pam Samuelson-like taxonomy that tells everyone what to do in the next case of innovation, instead of having a set of rules for domain names, a set for banner ads, and another set for keywords, which is where we are now [read post]