Search for: "Panasonic Corporation"
Results 61 - 80
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2011, 8:36 am
In the Order, ALJ Gildea granted a joint motion filed by Complainant Panasonic Corporation and Respondents Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Freescale Semiconductor Japan Ltd., Freescale Semiconductor Malaysia Sdn. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:25 pm
This could be due to the fact that large, politically-influential corporations lose hundreds of millions of dollars every year as a result of this type of fraud. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:00 pm
Shamita Etienne-Cummings and the law firm of White & Case LLP (“W&C”) from representing Complainant Panasonic Corporation, Ltd. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:49 pm
In the order, ALJ Luckern granted Respondents Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic of North America, Victor Company of Japan Limited, JVC America Corp., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, BestBuy.Com, LLC, and Best Buy Stores, L.P., B&H Foto & Electronics Corp., Buy.com Inc., QVC, Inc. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am
But even with all the suppoed deficiencies of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, foreign and US corporations want to protect their innovations and have filed a record number of applications this year. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am
Microsoft Corporation, et. al. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:09 pm
Respondents argued that they only learned of the underlying facts from documents recently produced by Complainant Panasonic Corporation (“Panasonic”) and in a recent deposition of one of the ’364 patent’s co-inventors. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 5:31 pm
In support of the motion, Respondents asserted that Complainant Panasonic Corporation (“Panasonic”) did not meet the statutory requirements of obtaining an earlier filing date pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 1:02 pm
Panasonic Corporation of Japan supplanted Huawei Technologies of China as the top PCT filer in 2009 (1,891 vs. 1,846, respectively). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:25 am
That’s all we do here,” says Luckern, who oversees judges, assigns cases, sets deadlines for when investigations must be completed, and hears claims himself, including separate recent disputes involving Nokia Corporation, Apple Inc., and Panasonic Corporation. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:05 pm
Both orders addressed motions filed by Respondents Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Panasonic Semiconductor Discrete Devices Co., Ltd. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
At rival Panasonic (PC), nobody earned enough to require disclosure under the new rules. [read post]
28 May 2010, 10:26 pm
After all, HUJ says that it has extensively licensed Einstein’s intellectual property rights, including to companies such as “Apple Computer, Bell Atlantic, Citibank, Columbia Pictures, Daimler-Chrysler, Dell Computers, Deloitte LLP, Disney, Dow Jones & Company, Eastman Kodak, Einstein Noah Bagel Corporation, Epson, France Telecom, Hyundai Motor Company, IBM, Intel Corporation, Johnson & Johnson, Kraft Foods, LegoLand, Mars, Microsoft, NASA, National… [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
- APRA to continue licensing music for public performances on condition it allows option of dealing directly with music publishers (IP Whiteboard) Sorbent brand success leads to trade mark victory (IP Whiteboard) Not complying with an injunction – FCA decision in Deckers Outdoor Corporation Pty Ltd v Farley (ipwars.com) Aussies drive logos, imagery from ciggie boxes? [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 1:02 pm
The investigation is based on an April 1, 2010 complaint filed by Panasonic Corporation, Ltd. of Japan alleging violation of Section 337 in the importation into the U.S. and sale of certain large scale integrated circuit semiconductor chips and products containing same that infringe certain claims of U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 3:24 pm
On April 1, 2010, Panasonic Corporation, Ltd. of Japan (“Panasonic”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:49 am
According to the Notice of Investigation, the Commission has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: Panasonic Corporation of Japan Panasonic Semiconductor Discrete Devices Co. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
: Trek Bicycle Corporation v Trek Winery, LLC (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) District Court C D California: No preliminary injunction in ‘Planet [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
: Trek Bicycle Corporation v Trek Winery, LLC (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) District Court C D California: No preliminary injunction in ‘Planet [read post]
