Search for: "Park v. Respondent" Results 81 - 100 of 2,435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 11:19 am by Richard Aynes - Guest
  was an outlier, so are the laws of the City of Chicago and the Village of Oak Park. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:05 pm
The employee asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled incrimination and refused to respond. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 6:21 am by Michael J. Petro
   On the night of March 21, 2012, City of Fitchburg police officers responded to an anonymous 911 call reporting a group of twenty-five individuals acting loudly and displaying hand guns in a parking lot. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:16 am by J
Shersby v Grenehurst Park Residents Co Ltd LRX/142/2007 Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) The appellant held a lease of a flat in a former mansion house. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:16 am by J
Shersby v Grenehurst Park Residents Co Ltd LRX/142/2007 Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) The appellant held a lease of a flat in a former mansion house. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 4:59 pm
So NRA is now a “Respondent in Support of Petitioners. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:01 am by Lauren Wood, Olswang LLP
The respondent, Mrs Arnold, is the freehold owner of the leisure park and the lessor of the above leases (the lessor). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:37 am by gmlevine
By agreeing to its registrar’s “parking policy” and not “un-park[ing]” the respondent violates the Policy, Diners Club International Ltd. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:05 pm by charley foster
Hempey of Hempey & Meyers, LLP for Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant, and Tracy Murakami, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, for Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee state of Hawaii.Here's the description of the case and its issues provided on the judiciary's oral arguments schedule:The defendant in this case, Lloyd Pratt, received three citations for camping without a permit in Na Pali State Park on the island of Kaua? [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT DINERO, ON BEHALF OF HIS MINOR CHILDREN AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, vORCHARD PARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS, ANDREW M. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT DINERO, ON BEHALF OF HIS MINOR CHILDREN AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, vORCHARD PARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS, ANDREW M. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:04 am by Patricia Salkin
The petitioner commenced this Article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Yorktown, which determined that a variance was not required in order to park vehicles in the front yard of a property owned by the respondent Faith Bible Church. [read post]