Search for: "Parker v. Jacobs"
Results 41 - 60
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2014, 6:15 am
The Court of Appeals (Kearse, Jacobs and Parker) disagrees and reinstates the case for a new trial.The district court said there was no evidence that the son's disability was the reason why the parents were denied the right to live there. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
To summarize one can quote Justice Jacob in the case's first appeal in the High Court: "...the mere fact that websites can be accessed anywhere in the world does not mean, for trade mark purposes that the law should be regarded as being used everywhere in the world. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:17 am
Last week the Court issued its decision in Environmental Protection Agency v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 10:13 am
The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Kearse and Parker) says that Kovacs can invoke Couto. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:50 am
He sues the police, but he loses the case.The case is MacLeod v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Alcon (Pantopaque), 2002 WL 34201763 Deposition2002-08-13 Parker v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:41 am
United States v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:33 am
At Reason, Jacob Sullum discusses the questions about the constitutionality of warrantless electronic surveillance left open by United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:29 am
The plaintiff moved to disqualify the firm, and the motion was granted.Student note: The discussions between the plaintiff and the firm, which purportedly included matters at issue in the instant action, create the danger that confidences were disclosed, thus warranting the disqualification of the firm.Case: Jacobs v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 7:34 am
Bill Frievogel notes a recent appellate decision in New York: Albert Jacobs, LLP v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Deposition2002-07-16 Parker v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:53 pm
Bayer (Baycol) Trial2005-02-09 Jacob v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm
”In Rivera v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:36 am
Parker, Chip. 301, 6 Am.Dec. 735 (1814). [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
PARKER New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011 KF395 .P37 2011 See Catalog Communication in law -- United States TONGUE-TIED AMERICA / ROBERT N. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
PARKER New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011 KF395 .P37 2011 See Catalog Communication in law -- United States TONGUE-TIED AMERICA / ROBERT N. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
L. 125-161 (2011).NATURAL GAS.Porter, Jacob L. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive effect: Champion… [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 5:51 am
December 14, 2010) (Jacobs, Pooler, Parker, CJJ)In United States v. [read post]
