Search for: "Parks v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2021, 9:02 am by Richard Hunt
SHC Laguna Niguel I, LLC et al, 2021 WL 2165208 (C.D. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 6:55 am by Richard Hunt
The plaintiff’s proposed class was “all persons with qualified mobility disabilities,” but his complaints concerning parking would, in many cases, affect only those actually confined to a wheelchair. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:12 pm by Richard Hunt
BOP Fighat7th LLC et al, 2019 WL 1081207 (C.D. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 26 conference)   CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am by Kevin Kaufman
Taxes, after all, are within policymakers’ authority in a way that the weather, or the rising appeal of big cities, really aren’t. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:59 am by Chuck Cosson
  Applications evolved to allow use of mobile phones for payments to vending machines, parking meters, and for mobile money transfers (so-called mobile ATMs). [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm by Dennis Crouch
” Eldred, 537 U.S. at 219; see also Park ‘N Fly, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am by Beth Graham
Sticky Arbitration Clauses We present the results of the first empirical study of the extent to which businesses have switched to arbitration after AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]