Search for: "Parrot, Inc" Results 61 - 80 of 125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2014, 5:21 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Fogo de Chao (Holdings) Inc., v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
With all regular Kats busy, in hiding or in the wrong time zone, it fell to occasional contributor and long-term Katfriend Aaron Wood (Swindell & Pearson) to step into the breach and write this post:Unlike the famous Norwegian Blue parrot, it appears that trade mark surveys were not dead -- just sleeping! [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:14 am by Peter Mahler
The Second Department’s 1998 Porciello ruling likewise made no mention of subject matter jurisdiction; it simply parroted Warde-McCann. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:54 am by Broc Romanek
Buffett’s conglomerate, Berkshire Hathaway Inc., is Coke’s largest holder of stock in the company, owning 9% of the beverage giant’s shares. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 12:14 pm by Steve Harms
  (http://www.insidearm.com/daily/debt-collection-news/debt-collection/debt-collector-wins-appeal-in-precedential-letter-language-case/)The case is entitled Wallace v Diversified Consultants, Inc. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 12:14 pm by Steve Harms
  (http://www.insidearm.com/daily/debt-collection-news/debt-collection/debt-collector-wins-appeal-in-precedential-letter-language-case/)The case is entitled Wallace v Diversified Consultants, Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:01 am
., Inc., 691 F.3d 686, 700-01 (5th Cir. 2012)). [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:09 am by Mandour & Associates
  Drone Technologies, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Parrot, Inc. for its use of certain technology that allows toy drone owners to operate their devices by using an application on their smartphones. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:39 am by Joy Waltemath
” Further the judge construed investigation to mean a thorough or searching inquiry and suggested that neither the mere gathering of information from others or the parroting of that information without independent analysis would be sufficient to qualify as an investigation. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
 The Court found that Preedy's declaration in support of the motion "simply parroted" the managing agent standard set forth in White v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:21 am
[The first sentence is essentially parroting an integer of claim 1; the second sentence is parroting claim 3] Specifically, the judge found, that “claim 3 broadly mirrors the words used in the last sentence of paragraph 17, and is, as it seems to be, envisaging a different position closer to the second intermediate image than claim 1, but not on it [the image plane] or on the eyepiece side of it. [read post]