Search for: "Party 2314" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2017, 10:16 am by Patricia Salkin
The governing body for the locality served by the BZA is a necessary party under Code § 15.2-2314, and a litigant may not amend the petition after the 30-day period to belatedly add the necessary parties identified in Code § 15.2-2314. [read post]
6 May 2014, 12:10 pm by Patricia Salkin
The City relied on Code § 15.2–2314, which stated that “the governing body, the landowner, and the applicant” were necessary parties to appeals from the BZA to the circuit court. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 10:54 pm by Patricia Salkin
The court found that current case law was consistent with the understanding that that a litigant who appeals the judgment of a board of zoning appeals under Code § 15.2-2314 must identify the governing body as a necessary party in the petition, and must do so within 30 days of the board of zoning appeals’ final decision. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 11:20 pm
"Bill" Carrico Sr., sponsor of HB 2314, characterized the Senate committee defeat of it as persecution of the Christian faith. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 2:13 pm
Board of Fire & Police Commissioners, No. 11-2314 (7th Cir. 2/26/13), by clicking here. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:45 am by Roel van Woudenberg
" The current J-decision addresses the topic again, and refers to the EPC1973 situation, the explanatory notes of EPC2000's drafting, the distinguishing T 1402/14, R.51(2) as amended per 1/1/2017, and EPO form 2522, which was sent to the party in the present case and clearly states that a patent application is deemed withdrawn only upon expiry of the six-month grace period for paying the renewal fee with additional fee. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm by Fred Abrams
§2314-- Interstate or foreign transfer of property obtained by fraud;   28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 9:13 pm
§2314-- Interstate or foreign transfer of property obtained by fraud; 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
That means that dealers, auction houses, collectors, and associated parties actually must do the investigative diligence required so that they are not directly or indirectly aiding criminal activity. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:37 am by Lewis Gainor
The statute criminalizing the transportation of stolen goods or property is 18 USC 2314. [read post]