Search for: "Party X v. Party Y" Results 21 - 40 of 456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2012, 7:48 am
I associate myself with the sentiments and frustration expressed by Munby J in In Re X & Y (ibid) which I expect is shared by the other family judges, not only those in the Family Division. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:43 pm
., where defendant agreed to plead guilty to X offense, in return for Y sentence, but now seeks relief (as authorized by Proposition 47) to reduce the X offense to a misdemeanor and hence only have to serve a sentence of less-than-Y.So does the passage of Proposition 47 allow the prosecution to retroactively withdraw from the plea agreement, even after the defendant has (as here) served years in prison, or do we assume that both parties (the prosecution and the… [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
   There was some suspicion that X and Y were the same person and had some connection with the defendants. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
 The claim is unlikely to define a single mixture, but, either because x y and z are defined with ranges, or because other conditions v and w also affect the outcome but are not specified, a number of mixtures are possible that fall within the scope of the claims.The Anon went on to say“Said mixture not being characterisable by techniques in common practice today, but identifiable by a 3rd party using their new fangled gadget, such that they are able to… [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:53 am by Patent Arcade Staff
(g) said dot generator including x and y comparators and x and y stacks operatively connected to one another and to said display computer, said x and y comparators receiving, respectively, x and y counts corresponding to the x and y addresses of said symbols. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 1:40 pm by Schachtman
A Gedanken Experiment An expert witness writes a report that X, a drug therapy, causes Y, a benefit in survival, for a disease, Z. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:09 am
“You infringe patent x with product y”) will have to wait for a longer time than a Claimant who gives more detailed information (e.g. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:53 pm by Rick E. Rayl
  But in Liston Brick Company, the twist was that property "X" was actually a larger parcel that encompassed property "Y. [read post]