Search for: "Party X v. Party Y"
Results 41 - 60
of 458
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2023, 4:23 pm
To be sure, X. is a party to this case and ostensibly subject to compulsory process. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:40 pm
” Monasky v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
App’x 808 (Fed. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 1:16 pm
It essentially read: “1) Plaintiffs say X; 2) Defendants say Y; 3) Plaintiffs are right. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 12:08 am
2.2.1 La recourante peut invoquer la violation du droit fédéral, y compris l'excès ou l'abus du pouvoir d'appréciation, la constatation inexacte ou incomplète des faits pertinents et l'inopportunité (art. 49 PA). [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 pm
“The Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress last month reinforced Xi Jinping’s grip on the levers of power in China, which continue to be weaponized against the universally recognized human rights of the people of China and, increasingly, those outside China’s borders,” said CECC Chair Merkley. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am
The bill has been met with criticism by journalists, campaign groups and cross-party MPs, who argue that it will have a harmful effect on investigative reporters who may be jailed for publishing public interest information disclosed by whistleblowers. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
But if that's so, then there's no such thing as a judge declaring that at future date X, but not until then, it will be case that statute or rule Y is and has always been unlawful. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 7:32 am
Granting an adoption preference to parents of Tribe X who live on the reservation of Tribe Y when the child is a member of Tribe Y would indeed be a means of respecting tribal sovereignty and not simply treating Indian status as a racial classification. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 8:18 am
Typical political claims (e.g., “candidate X is a big-spending liberal” or “candidate Y doesn’t care about our kids as he has voted against school funding increases”) are less likely to be actionable than are claims about the character, integrity, and similar personal qualities of a candidate (e.g., a claim that a candidate did something illegal). [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm
It was also not a forgone conclusion that proof that X obtained the Davidson Order amounted to proof that X was the anonymous KiwiFarms poster [71]. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 5:22 am
There is no balancing in the sense of a passage that would say procompetitive benefits X and Y outweigh the anticompetitive effects A, B, and C. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 9:32 am
Formation The court has little regard for the email notice, in part because it apparently didn’t have a call-to-action (if X, then Y). [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
National Audubon Soc'y, 556 F. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 8:45 am
App’x 567 (2d Cir. 2010); see also Cuellar v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Under Aleman Gonzalez, a trial judge can no longer tell the U.S. government, “I hereby order you to stop applying Immigration Policy X to group Y. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:04 am
They get lazy.While the district judge presiding over Epic Games v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 10:38 am
App’x 605, 610 (Fed. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:49 am
The unprecedented leak of a draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
