Search for: "Patel v. Hall"
Results 21 - 40
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2013, 12:05 am
Patel & Ors v SSHD, Anwar v SSHD, and Alam v SSHD, heard 3 July 2013. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 9:45 am
In Washington v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:57 pm
In Schechner v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
Verchick and Abby Hall. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
Mr Jem Aldridge v The Hunts Post (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; Mr Carl Waring v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; A woman v The Argus (Brighton) 03/05/2012; Mr Mark Gunter v Guernsey Press & Star (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; Mr Leonard Kernott v Daily Mail (Clause 3), 03/05/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Northamptonshire Evening Telegraph (Clause 1), 01/05/2012; A woman v East Riding Mail (Clauses 3, 9), 30/04/2012. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
[Update] On 27 January 2012 HHJ Parkes QC gave judgment in the case of Patel v United ([2012] EWHC 92 (QB)), heard on 20 January 2012. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am
Patel v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:22 am
Judge Marilyn Hall Patel cites her own case for the proposition that this is a conflict. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:54 am
United States and Hirabayashi v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 11:40 am
Silicon Storage Tech v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 5:11 pm
See Suzuki v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 7:35 pm
DocMagic v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:39 pm
Admittedly a “nightclub,” GIC hosted precisely the type of dance-hall assembly that the [City of Dallas v.] [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 11:05 pm
As a result Judge Marilyn Hall Patel found that the officers had established qualified immunity and granted summary judgment for the defendants. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm
Judge Marilyn Hall Patel explains: Defendant Capital One argues that plaintiffs have not alleged any wrongdoing by Capital One or its lender predecessor. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:38 pm
Judge Marilyn Hall Patel granted summary judgment for LIUNA. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:28 am
On January 14, 2011, in Patel v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:28 pm
Gray v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm
Judge Marilyn Hall Patel disagreed. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:37 am
Judge Marilyn Hall Patel stated, Because there are two reasonable interpretations of this provision, the contract is ambiguous. [read post]
