Search for: "Patents & More, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 9,724
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2021, 5:03 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch iLife Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:00 am by Audrey A Millemann
By automating the data entry, the patented systems were more accurate than the manual systems. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:29 pm by Mandour & Associates
After Samsung filed a counterclaim, Ericsson added 8 more patents to its case. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 11:26 am by Ross Dannenberg
Well it looks like Worlds, Inc. is at it again, and today filed a lawsuit against Activision Blizzard for patent infringement. [read post]
16 May 2022, 12:16 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The court requested the CVSG brief on May 3, 2021–more than a year ago. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 9:59 pm
("LabCorp"), have created more than a frisson of anxiety in the biotechnology and medical diagnostics community, due the apprehension that medical diagnostics claims might generally be deemed not to be patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 7:33 pm
It will now be more difficult (read: more expensive than ever) to prosecute and obtain patents and easier to invalidate them. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 8:12 pm by Antoinette Konski
Patenting diagnostic methods is more challenging in the wake of the U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:20 pm
Elkhart, Indiana - Indiana patent attorneys for Lifetime Industries, Inc. and LTI Flexible Products, Inc. of Modesto, California have filed another complaint asserting patent infringement against Lippert Components Manufacturing, Inc. of Elkhart, Indiana. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
Practice Tip: In March 2014, Lilly et al. filed a 101-page complaint making similar accusations against more than thirty defendants: Accord Healthcare, Inc. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 11:03 am
In a 101-page complaint, Indiana patent counsel for Plaintiffs Lilly; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; and Ube Industries, Ltd. sued alleging patent infringement by more than thirty Defendants. [read post]