Search for: "Paul C. May" Results 121 - 140 of 2,951
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2019, 6:01 am
Posted by , on Friday, May 24, 2019 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of May 17–23, 2019. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 6:05 pm by Tom Smith
In May he introduced Bill C-10, which would put internet speech under the jurisdiction of the broadcast regulator, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:05 pm
The numbers may mislead. [read post]
1 May 2016, 6:32 am
Posted by Paul Ferrillo, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, on Sunday, May 1, 2016 Editor's Note: Paul A. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:20 am by Frank Cranmer
US Commission on International Religious Freedom: Annual Report, May 2024. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 3:46 pm
I think we're closest to position C on Paul's list, and fundamental structural obstacles invite equally fundamental intervention. [read post]
20 May 2019, 6:16 am
Posted by Paul Hammes, Rich Mills, and Carsten Kniephoff, Ernst & Young LLP, on Monday, May 20, 2019 Editor's Note: Paul Hammes is Global Divestment Leader, Rich Mills is Americas Divestment Leader, and Carsten Kniephoff is Europe, Middle East, India and Africa Divestment (EMEIA) Leader at Ernst & Young LLP. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 5:15 am
Michael Stepp, David R Cosgrove, and Paul C Barnaba. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 3:40 am by Jasmine Joseph
Religion and Constitutionalism: Oscillations Along a Continuum, Paul T. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 1:08 am
He may be a tax nerd, but he is one with a huge heart. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:21 pm by David Bernstein
It makes me a bit uncomfortable, however, that (a) the conference is styled “The Finest Legal Mind”: A Symposium in Celebration of Justice John Paul Stevens; (b) the conference is stacked with former Stevens clerks, and former clerks rarely criticize their Justices in public; and (c) also consistent with the celebration theme, I don’t see any speaker listed who is likely be critical of the ideological thrust of Justice Stevens’s jurisprudence. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 1:28 pm
More specifically looking at RSA 458-C:5, I(a) which states that the trial court “may deviate from the guideline support amount if it finds that a child will incur ongoing extraordinary medical expenses. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:15 pm by LindaMBeale
Confessore & Luo, Groups Targeted by IRS Tested Rules on Politics, New York Times (May 26, 2013). [read post]