Search for: "Pay to Play Law Group"
Results 81 - 100
of 6,547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2010, 7:28 am
Well, the reality is they probably are paying too much. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 1:29 pm
As we continue through the summer and move closer to implementation of the order on October 1st, we here at Pay-to-Play Law Blog will be sure to keep the regulated community apprised of any updates or tweaks in the Treasure State. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 11:40 pm
The Match Plaintiffs admit that hypothetically a user could pay for a subscription in a Match Plaintiff app downloaded on an iPad, then switch to an Android phone, download the same app from Google Play, and use the subscription in the Google Play downloaded app. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 8:29 am
As the holiday squabble over the value and legality of the new rules continues, we here at the Pay to Play Law Blog pledge to keep our readership informed and up to date on the latest. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm
In certain settings, state law also places similar restrictions on redevelopment contractors and individuals or entities that seek to evade the normal pay-to-play rules through indirect, earmarked contributions to covered officials via intermediary groups. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 1:32 pm
A coalition of business groups have filed a lawsuit against the Fair Political Practices Commission, seeking to stop enforcement of new pay-to-play restrictions in Senate Bill 1439. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:57 am
One group will work for the firm's paying clients and get paid the normal first year starting salary. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:06 am
However, there appears to be a new tactic, namely a top-to-bottom review of the copyright laws (rather than just the singular issue of radio paying to air recordings). [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Both pay secrecy and gendered negotiation styles are both in play. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 4:19 pm
On May 28, 2019, Bloomberg Law published an article involving one of McKennon Law Group PC’s cases in Bloomberg Law’s Benefits & Executive Compensation News section. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:53 am
You don’t fix one problem by creating another, i.e., punishing small and midsize employers by requiring them to start paying groups of employees overtime en masse. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 7:38 am
Our regulatory practice group assists financial service providers with complex issues that arise in the course of their business, including compliance with federal and state laws and rules. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 7:38 am
Our regulatory practice group assists financial service providers with complex issues that arise in the course of their business, including compliance with federal and state laws and rules. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 5:00 pm
ERISA and Federal Income Tax Rules From the standpoint of federal benefits law, nothing prevents an employer from paying monthly premiums on behalf of furloughed and laid off employees in order to keep coverage in force under a fully insured group health plan. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 7:06 am
A group of NYU law students recently raised the novel proposition that they should be paid for their work as law journal editors. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:17 am
This just in: AALS Section on Agricultural and Food LawCo-sponsored by the Sections on Minority Groups and Environmental Law Race and Racism in Food and AgricultureFood and agriculture play important roles in maintaining systemic racial oppression. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 1:29 pm
As we continue through the summer and move closer to implementation of the order on October 1st, we here at Pay-to-Play Law Blog will be sure to keep the regulated community apprised of any updates or tweaks in the Treasure State. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
The play remains a class portrayal of the claims of natural law versus the laws of the state. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 12:04 pm
The State of Play for Pay-For-Delay Pay-for-delay agreements arise in the pharmaceutical sector under the regulatory framework of the Hatch-Waxman Act. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 1:17 pm
While Notice 2013-45 gives large more time to prepare to comply with Code Section 4980H, it provides no relief from the obligation to pay the PCORI fee or from other group health plan mandates imposed by ACA or other applicable federal laws. [read post]
