Search for: "PeaceHealth" Results 21 - 40 of 41
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2012, 12:11 pm by DougW
Peacehealth –  No. 85697-4, which gives plaintiff medical negligence lawyers another tool to find the truth. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:13 pm
Yost was taken to PeaceHealth and was treated for bruises and was being evaluated for other injuries. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:55 pm by Thom Lambert
  The Ninth Circuit approved this safe harbor in its PeaceHealth decision. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:32 am by Thom Lambert
I’ve just finished a draft of a paper for an upcoming conference on the Roberts Court’s business law decisions. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 6:26 am by Thom Lambert
Creative labeling should not enable a plaintiff to avoid PeaceHealth’s sensible rule. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:25 pm by Josh Wright
If the plaintiff is making a predation claim involving bundled discounts, I think the PeaceHealth standard is workable and useful and we should keep it. [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:19 am
Versions of that test have been adopted by a variety of commentators, agencies, and courts, including the DOJ in its Section 2 report, the Antitrust Modernization Commission, the Areeda-Hovenkamp treatise, and the Ninth Circuit's PeaceHealth decision. [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:18 am
(This is the so called “discount attribution” approach the Ninth Circuit endorsed in PeaceHealth.) [read post]
6 May 2009, 4:07 am
In PeaceHealth, for example, the defendant was accused of bundling primary, secondary and tertiary medical care. [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:34 am
  It has deflected or lacked the opportunity to review significant lower court decisions including Rambus, Microsoft, PeaceHealth, LePages, Dentsply, Spirit/Northwest, Conwood, Concord Boat, American Airlines, Beech-Nut/Gerber, Broadcom/Qualcomm, Virgin/BA, and Pepsi/Coke. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 6:43 pm
That’s the safe harbor created by the Ninth Circuit’s recent PeaceHealth decision (discussed here). [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 4:05 pm
Earlier this month I noted that the Ninth Circuit invited bored evidence students to submit amicus briefs on a FRE 804(a) issue. [read post]