Search for: "People v Spalding"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am
Justice Kagan has been named to TIME’s 2013 list of its one hundred most influential people in the world. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:08 am
See Kemp v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:37 am
”Parrish, a partner at the Washington, D.C. office of international law firm King & Spalding and a member of its national appellate and strategic counseling practice group, was involved with the landmark Coleman v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:19 pm
In Nelson v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:43 pm
Chilton Varner of King & Spalding LLP, outside counsel for Merck said, "Unfortunately, the plaintiff had medical problems that cause people to develop the jaw and dental problems that the plaintiff has, regardless of whether they were taking FOSAMAX. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 3:18 pm
The report has some surprising news about car wrecks in Suburban Atlanta, v. in metro Atlanta. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:06 am
Referring to the 2010 ruling in Holder v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:41 pm
Smith and Rompilla v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:28 am
Defending virtual child porn is probably not all that popular with donors; besides, how many people would notice or care about its absence from this case? [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:51 am
"Paul Clement and K&S represent the prison inmates seeking release in Brown v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 8:51 am
In the matter of Paper v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:11 pm
See Gideon v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm
Clement, now with King & Spalding in Washington. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:52 pm
In People v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
KPMG and Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:26 pm
"The ScotusWiki file for Connick v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
We have very bright people on our side. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:10 pm
The court in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:53 am
If ever there were justification for intrusive judicial review of constitutional provisions that protect “discrete and insular minorities,” United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:29 am
The case, Lawyers Funds for Client Protection v. [read post]
