Search for: "People v. Horton" Results 41 - 60 of 127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Horton, the California Supreme Court’s most recent detailed examination of the revision/amendment distinction. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by John Gregory
Much of the recent debate in the U.S. has focused on the case of Loomis v Wisconsin. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 10:08 am by John Floyd
  Plain View Exception to Search Warrant   In 1990, the Supreme Court in Horton v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Steve Lubet
Horton–perhaps he was still “traveling”–so we decided to republish it with many more people signed on. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:34 am by Orin Kerr
Barrios-Moriera, 872 F.2d 12, 14-15 (2d Cir.1989) (apartment hallway), overruled on other grounds by Horton v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
Some people think that the Enforcement Directive (2004/48/EC) is not working properly. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:37 am
 The court went on to note that[f]ollowing the lead of the Supreme Court in Horton v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:00 am by Administrator
… Susan on the SoapboxBoycott Tim Hortons? [read post]
29 May 2015, 8:25 am
Most of my new book The Grasping Hand, focuses on the broader legal and political issues raised by the Supreme Court’s ruling in Kelo v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 1:13 pm by James Fox
  As historians such as James and Lois Horton and Stephen Kantrowitz have observed, the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act marked a turning point for African Americans. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People v… [read post]