Search for: "People v. Jones (1991)" Results 81 - 100 of 127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2013, 4:27 pm by Will Baude
Occupational Safety & Health Review Comm’n, 947 F.2d 1483, 1485 (11th Cir. 1991) (following “binding precedent in Atlas Roofing Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 am by John Day
Jones, 164 S.W.2d 823 (Tenn. 1942) the law required the filing of a sworn, detailed statement of campaign expenses not more than ten but no less than five days before an election. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
” 1 Courts, Health Science & the Law 397, 398 (1991)(“This indeterminancy complicates any case in which epidemiological evidence forms the basis for causation, especially when attributable fractions are lower than 50%. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case generated extensive news coverage in Connecticut, including a good summary of the oral argument in January 2012.The case is Jones v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 8:48 am by Gritsforbreakfast
" Sunset staff put it bluntly: "The people of Texas had every reason to believe they were getting an ethics agency when they voted for the constitutional amendment creating the Texas Ethics Commission in 1991. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Jones, 298 N.W.2d 296, 298 (Iowa 1980). [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm by Dianne Saxe
  Inco was for many years the major employer in the Port Colborne area, employing as many as 2,000 people. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:01 pm by Zoe Tillman
” Contreras joined Jones Day’s Washington office after graduating from the University of Pennsylvania School of Law in 1991. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
I expect Student Loans to be the scourge of this Generation; I routinely talk to wonderful people who have gigantic student loans, and have no chance of getting them paid any time during this depression. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
Richardson–Merrell, Inc., 584 A.2d 1383, 1386-88 (1991); Makripodis v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm by Nick Holmes
Primary legislation can be viewed as at any point in time since 1991. [read post]