Search for: "People v. McCann" Results 41 - 60 of 85
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by INFORRM
Around 2,900 people have contacted the police to ask if their voicemails have been hacked. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
” Antony White QC Opinion: “Defamation and False Privacy” – Hugh Tomlinson QC Is following people illegal? [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette reports that Charlotte Church is suing the The People newspaper for a story that alleged she proposed to her boyfriend while drunk and singing karaoke in a pub. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
“There already is a rather strong regulation against hacking people’s telephones – the law. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 2:50 am by John Day
 In Eric's opinion, that means that trial judges are going to require that there is a "factual predicate" to make the demand,  a showing required by in an opinion by a New York appellate court in McCann v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:31 am by INFORRM
Introducing the debate, Labour MP Michael McCann said, in relation to the PCC, that, “Right now there is a serious lack of confidence in the system. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
I do not think that the decision in McCann has answered this problem. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
I do not think that the decision in McCann has answered this problem. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am by Fiona de Londras
Possible relevance for Ireland Our Housing Act 1966 bears striking resemblance to the 1996 Act in the UK, especially inasmuch as a District Court judge is required (“shall”, s. 62; Dublin Corporation v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:27 am by Fiona de Londras
I blogged about that conference and the Declaration that emerged briefly at the time, and indeed Alastair Mowbray has produced a really excellent overview of both for the Human Rights Law Review which people with access to Oxford Journals can download here. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm by Stephen Page
Put simply, natural justice involves decision-makers informing people of the case against them or their interests, giving them a right to be heard (the hearing rule); not having a personal interest in the outcome (the rule against bias); and acting only on the basis of logically probative evidence (the no evidence rule). [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
This followed a lengthy inquiry, taking evidence from claimants (the McCanns, Max Mosley), defendants (newspapers and other publishers) and lawyers. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 6:59 am by Bexis
"That's the lesson of this new New York appellate case, McCann v. [read post]