Search for: "People v. Rogers" Results 161 - 180 of 1,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 The greatest potential benefit: convince courts to think more in terms of Rogers v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:30 pm by Elie Mystal
Just running around New York City, and telling people they suck. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Wozencraft, 15 F.3d 432 (5th Cir. 1994) (use of undercover police officer’s identity in film protected by First Amendment); Rogers v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:23 pm
Working from that Comment, the courts have fashioned the so-called "relatedness" test, which first appeared in the Second Circuit in Rogers v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Yesterday the University at Buffalo Law School held the panel discussion “Sex, Solicitation, and the Supreme Court: Remembering People v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:01 am
The case was State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Fortunately for Nest Fadell and Rogers came equipped with plenty of experiences in dealing with such tactics from their Apple iPod and iPhone days. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 4:36 am by Florian Mueller
In the old days, people sometimes bought games because of appealing box designs, but threw them away after an hour or so of playing.If impulse purchases were banned, and with Apple having made it pretty much impossible to make serious money on iOS with in-game advertising, the business model might shift to subscriptions--which Apple would probably even prefer.That said, it definitely is interesting when a federal judge dealing with a case like Epic v. [read post]