Search for: "People v. Smith (1984)"
Results 81 - 100
of 205
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
Promoting public safety is a "well-established goal" (Heller II, 698 F Supp 2d at 191; see also Schall v Martin, 467 US 253, 264 [1984] ["The legitimate and compelling state interest' in protecting the community from crime cannot be doubted. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
Clark v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
At sentencing, counsel filed a motion under People v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:25 am
”); People v. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm
Smith, 58 N.J (1971).3. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:33 am
Three people in the bar ended up dead, and two others seriously wounded in the resulting gunfire. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
First, the government might argue that some people find handgun advertising offensive, and do not wish to see it in public places. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
The case of Conrad v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
” United States v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:45 pm
The state Court of Appeals abolished the alienation-of-affections action and its lesser-known counterpart – criminal conversation – in 1984 in Cannon v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
Smith, 73 N.C. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 10:51 am
State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
Meanwhile Roy Greenslade suggested that Lord Chris Smith – a member of the IPSO “Foundation Group” – is a “shoo-in” as its chair. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
Haliye v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am
Q2: The famous copyright case Feist v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
This post is from the Reed Smith (and now we should add Cozen) side of the blog only, as Dechert is involved in the litigation to be discussed.You’ll have to forgive us – we’re weird that way – but we found the opinion in Carter v. [read post]
