Search for: "People v. Stewart"
Results 41 - 60
of 898
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2023, 4:07 am
Walters and Meek v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
Canada On 20 March 2023, the Supreme Court of British Columbia ordered the plaintiffs to pay the reasonable costs of the defendant on a full indemnity basis, in the case of Mawhinney v Stewart, 2023 BCSC 419, [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
The plaintiff in Gonzalez v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am
It is extremely difficult to square the state bar’s version with what the prosecutor said, as recounted in Miller v Pate. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:31 am
For example, in her forceful dissent in West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:58 am
[I only count two votes to ratify Big Tech's sweeping immunity claims] The Supreme Court's oral argument in Gonzalez v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 8:02 am
Partway through oral argument before the Supreme Court in Gonzalez v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
”Four years later, in Gregg v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:34 pm
One thing that AI is creepily good at is faking people's voices. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
Surveillance On 30 January 2023, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal found MI5 agents “unlawfully retained people’s intercepted data,” via the use of surveillance warrants from 2014-2019, Liberty and Privacy International v Security Service [2023] UKIPTrib1. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
” The facts of Irvin v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:07 am
Stewart, reviewing Lex Pacificatoria, Jus Post Bellum, or Just “Good Practice”? [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 11:21 am
And to give people some guidance or give people some hope that that might happen. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 12:01 am
One of his more well-known opinions was in the obscenity case Jacobellis v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 7:20 am
The Human Rights Commissioner lodged a submission to the UN Committee Against Torture in November 2022, making 44 recommendations regarding the treatment of children in youth detention centres, First Nations people, those with a disability, and LGBTIQ+ people. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 2:26 pm
Stewart, 827 N.W.2d 128, 153-54 (Iowa 2013); Bird v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am
” She noted that, as in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:53 am
Across the country, paramilitaries have shown up, armed and intimidating, at events supporting white supremacy, school board meetings debating COVID policies or more inclusive curricula, LGBTQ–friendly events, and demonstrations in opposition to the Supreme Court’s overruling of Roe v. [read post]
