Search for: "Perez v. U. S. Government" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2013, 2:25 pm by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Entities subject to the Open Meetings Law and the Freedom of Information LawMatter of Reese v Daines, 2008 NY Slip Op 51879(U), decided on September 15, 2008, Supreme Court, Erie County, Patrick H. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 10:33 am by Eric Goldman
Nov. 18, 2021) The court literally could not be bothered to explain itself beyond a cite to Prager U: The district court properly dismissed Perezs action because Perez failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim….see also Prager U. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:25 am by David Cosgrove
[v]Some don’t consider this the fail-safe that the government is touting it to be. [read post]