Search for: "Performance Contracting, Inc" Results 161 - 180 of 6,594
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2014, 3:00 am
The Advisory discusses the English High Court's analysis, in Fern Computer Consultancy Ltd v Intergraph Cadworx & Analysis Solutions Inc [2014] EWHC 2908 (Ch) (29 August 2014), of the arguments for and against non-English forum selection and choice of law terms in commercial contracts involving English parties or performance in England, as well as permissive service of English court proceedings out of the jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 10:47 am by Richmond Cariaga
You should ensure that you include what happens in the case of non-performance, defects, or breaches of contract. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 3:54 pm by Bryan West
In December 2017, DeSantis contracted concrete-forming services and materials from Halton Forming, which subcontracted the work to Sutton Forming, Inc. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:17 pm by John Almy and William W. Pugh
With that, the court found that the Carrizo/Crescent MSA, coupled with the work order to perform P&A work, was a maritime contract. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 2:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Jefferson City Retirement LLC (“JCR”) appealed from the circuit court’s judgment in favor of Twehous Excavating Inc. on its claims for breach of contract and quantum meruit. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:36 pm by Blue Blog
Task Force Construction, Inc., and this case interprets some construction contract terms which impact Georgia subcontractors. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:36 pm by Blue Blog
Task Force Construction, Inc., and this case interprets some construction contract terms which impact Georgia subcontractors. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:36 pm by Blue Blog
Task Force Construction, Inc., and this case interprets some construction contract terms which impact Georgia subcontractors. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 7:02 am by PaulKostro
Marioni v. 94 Broadway, Inc., 374 N.J. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm by clc-admin
The owner asserted that the fee was a fixed fee, and also said that the contract should be interpreted in light of the parties’ actual performance of the contract and that the consultant was estopped from asserting that the fee was based on a percentage of the cost of construction. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 12:10 am
Ultimately, however, the church was excused from performance under the contract because the other party to it, a developer, had committed material breaches. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 7:05 am by Steven Koprince
 NGS contended that it was irrational for HHS to assign both offerors “Good” past performance ratings, in light of NGS’s successful performance of the incumbent contract. [read post]