Search for: "Performant Technologies, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 3,954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2009, 8:17 am
On November 4, 2009, the Federal Circuit is scheduled to hear oral argument in SiRF Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 7:45 am by Steven Koprince
The GAO’s decision in TechTrend, Inc., B-412009, B-412009.2 involved a Forest Service solicitation for human resources information technology and contract advisory and assistance services. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:15 am
Akamai Technologies, Inc., Docket No. 12-786, is a patent case involving technology for managing web images and video. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 6:02 am
PhatRat Technology LLC, a maker of wireless devices that gauge a wearer's performance, said that Apple and Nike are using its patented innovations without permission. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 5:57 pm
SensoryFlavors, Inc. et al Missouri Eastern District Court Filed: March 10, 2008 Plaintiff: Sensient Technologies Corporation, Sensient Flavors LLC Defendant: SensoryFlavors, Inc., Performance Chemicals & Ingredients Co., Diehl Food Ingredients, Inc., Highlander Partners, L.P. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:47 pm by Todd Hendrickson
 This new piece of high technology allows the surgeon to sit at a video game-like console to perform many types of surgery. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:24 am
The Ohio Department of Development recently announced a significant financial incentive that it awarded to Zyvex Performance Materials, Inc. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:11 am by Rob Robinson
With more investments, the contextual understanding of the technology grows, resulting in increasing performance. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:36 am by LTA-Editor
Aereo, Inc., and argues that Aereo is infringing the broadcasters’ public performance right and that by expanding on the earlier decision Cartoon Network LP, LLLP v CSC Holdings, Inc., the Second Circuit misinterpreted the text and the spirit of the Copyright Act. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:45 am by AIPLA
The Impact of the CAFC’s Joint Infringement Conundrum on Protecting Interactive TechnologiesThe conundrum created by the Federal Circuit’s joint infringement doctrine and its impact on protecting interactive computer-based technologies got worse last week with McKesson Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]