Search for: "Peters v. USA"
Results 101 - 120
of 493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2016, 2:33 pm
Among them was a holding that Miller v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 11:31 am
Dwyer Instruments Inc v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 2:08 pm
App. 4th 750 (2009) (“where the policy provides that special coverage for a particular type of claim is conditioned on express compliance with a reporting requirement, the time limit is enforceable without proof of prejudice”); but see Petrosantander (USA), Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:47 pm
USA Today, Newsweek, WSJ Law Blog, and the Volokh Conspiracy all have round-ups of this momentous day. [read post]
20 May 2017, 8:51 am
The Jewel v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
Briefly: In USA Today, Richard Wolf previews tomorrow’s oral argument in Town of Greece v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:20 pm
Scott Nelson has this post at the Consumer Law & Policy Blog about the Court's unanimous decision in Watson v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:39 am
Breyer discussed Bush v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
The legal communication papers being presented at RSA 2012: The 15th Rhetoric Society of America Biennial Conference, being held 25-28 May 2012, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, are listed below. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Human Rights, Subjectivity and the Potential of Narrative Maggie Werner, Hobart & William: Heroes v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:49 am
[USA] v Johnston, 145 AD3d 1240, 1240 [2016]; Matter of Barnes v Venettozzi, 135 AD3d 1250, 1251 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d 1183, 1184-1185 [2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 912 [2015]). [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 2:15 am
In addition, because the district court’s decisions on equitable matters—including a prospective royalty rate for the SEP portfolio—were based on issues common to the improperly adjudicated release payment, the district court’s decision was overturned in full and remanded for further proceedings, including a jury trial on the release payment rate (TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:09 am
The federal district court in Minnesota properly denied Bombardier’s post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law, the Federal Circuit ruled, rejecting Bombardier’s contention that the strength of its evidence was sufficient to nullify the jury’s verdict (Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 8:11 am
Nor did the Board err by considering design drawings submitted by the review petitioner as proof of design elements that were known in the art at the critical time of the challenged patents (B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:34 am
” Judge Dyk would hear the decisions on the merits, rather than vacate them for a new hearing before a new panel below (BedGear, LLC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:49 am
Jude Medical, LLC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
STERN v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 3:43 am
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention by Derk Visser, Laurence Lai, Peter de Lange, Kaisa Suominen€ 105 Patent Law Injunctions by Rafal Sikorski€ 181 [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 6:21 am
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention by Derk Visser, Laurence Lai, Peter de Lange, Kaisa Suominen€ 105 Patent Law Injunctions by Rafal Sikorski€ 181 [read post]
