Search for: "Petitions Office of"
Results 81 - 100
of 26,383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2014, 7:12 pm
The petition of the day is: Whitley v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:03 am
Today’s Petition of the Day is: Title: Prison Legal News v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
The petition of the day is: Alford v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:15 pm
The petition of the day is: Noriega v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 12:58 am
" The petition argues that by basing its decision in Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
The post Petitions of the week appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:50 am
No more waiting on the Petitions Office. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:34 pm
The petition of the day is: Bailey v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 2:49 pm
The petition of the day is: Florida v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:16 pm
The petition of the day is: Missouri v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 2:38 pm
Today’s first petition of the day is: Title: Werner v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 7:40 pm
The petition of the day is: Kansas v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
Petitioning the Commissioner of Education to remove a member of a school board from his or her office A number of district residents, taxpayers and current or former members of the Board of Education [Petitioners] sought to have a sitting member of the Board of Education [Respondent] removed from his office by action of the Commissioner of Education pursuant to §306 Education Law. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:15 am
Government’s combined petition for a writ of certiorari in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:45 am
The petition of the day is: Gardner v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:28 pm
We’ve posted the cert petition here. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
The post Petitions of the week appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 9:34 pm
The petition of the day is: Elizondo v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:26 pm
The petition of the day is: Mullenix v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 4:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) treatment of final Office actions for previous articles (Part I, Part II, Part III and Part IV, we noted, all too often, applicants acquiesce to premature or improper final Office actions rather than engage in a petition process they consider uncertain. [read post]
