Search for: "Phillip Kerr"
Results 41 - 60
of 141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2012, 8:19 am
The symposium included a keynote by Justice Antonin Scalia and participation by Judge Jeffrey Sutton, Ohio State Dean Alan Michaels, Illinois Dean Bruce Smith, Douglas Berman, Stephanos Bibas, Michael Dreeben, Jeffrey Fisher, Brian Fitzpatrick, Nancy Gertner, Orin Kerr, Joan Larsen, Deborah Merritt, William Nelson, James Oldham, Carter Phillips, Gene Schaerr, and Suja Thomas. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
On Monday 21 and Tuesday 22 March, Lords Hope, Rodger, Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear the devoluation appeal of Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
Phillips, 477 F.3d 215 (5th Cir. 2007). [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
From Monday 7 to Wednesday 9 March 2011, Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance and Collins will hear Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:29 pm
Chaired by Lorraine Greaves, the panel will include Russ Maynard from Insite, Thomas Kerr from UBC, as well as plenary speaker Wayne Hall.This is a free public event, and all are welcome to attend.If you are not able to attend, you can read summaries of the presentations next week at our new blog Core Neuroethics.For further information, visit the National Core for Neuroethics website. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 12:39 am
Phillips, & William A. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 7:37 am
The event was chaired by the effervescent Rosie Burbidge stepping into the shoes of the indisposed Jeremy Phillips at short notice. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
The case of E (Children) will be heard in Courtroom 2 by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Sir Nicholas Wilson. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 9:19 am
Bellinger, III, Phillip D. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 12:55 pm
(Orin Kerr) Commenter Richard Riley brings up an interesting point I haven’t seen mentioned before: Justice Scalia’s concurrence in Cruzan v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:02 am
The majority Justices (Lords Phillips, Brown, Collins, Kerr and Dyson) held that the appropriate starting point for the analysis of the question of the liability of expert witnesses for their evidence was that the existence of any immunity had to be clearly justified. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
The reasoning of the majority (Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown, Kerr and Dyson) The majority noted that the Extradition Act 2003, a piece of domestic legislation, was passed in order to give effect to the EU Framework Decision on European Arrest Warrants. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 3:57 am
Posted by: Orin Kerr | Aug 3, 2012 6:01:09 PMSo most articles editors say letters are irrelevant? [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am
For The Washington Post, Amber Phillips offers “a step-by-step rundown of key moments in the debate on gambling in America that got us to this monumental one. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 11:59 am
Sir Brian Kerr will be replacing Lord Carswell on 28th June 2009. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:17 pm
This isn't it.This is a post about Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Saville of Newdigate, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Baroness Hale of Richmond, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, Lord Mance, Lord Collins of Mapesbury, Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore, and Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony.Who? [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 2:51 am
Lord Phillips would also dismiss the appeal but for different reasons. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
In the Supreme Court the majority (Lord Phillips, Lord Hope, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Clarke) preferred a broader construction than the minority (Lord Judge, Lord Brown, Lord Rodger and Lord Walker) would have adopted. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
By a slim 4:3 majority (Lady Hale and Lords Phillips and Kerr dissenting), the Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal by finding that the claims of the servicemen should not be allowed to proceed on the basis that they were time-barred. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
By a slim 4:3 majority (Lady Hale and Lords Phillips and Kerr dissenting), the Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal by finding that the claims of the servicemen should not be allowed to proceed on the basis that they were time-barred. [read post]
