Search for: "Phillip Kerr" Results 61 - 80 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
On Wednesday 1 February 2012 in front of a panel of seven (L Phillips, L Walker, L Hale, L Brown, L Mance, L Kerr and L Dyson) over two days is the appeal of Assange v The Swedish Judicial Authority. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am by Laura Sandwell
It’s also a busy week in the Privy Council – on Monday 31 October Saint Aubin Limitee v Alain Jean Francois Doger de Speville (Mauritius) will be heard over one day by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix
On Wednesday 9 October Deenish Benjamin and Deochan Ganga v The State of Trinidad and Tobago will be heard by Dame Heather Hallett and Lords Phillips, Kerr, Clarke and Wilson. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:45 pm by Molly Runkle
Coverage of the opinion comes from Amy Howe for this blog, Lydia Wheeler of The Hill, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Brent Kendall of The Wall Street Journal, Sam Hananel of the Associated Press, and Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, with commentary coming from Orin Kerr for The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 5:57 am by William Ford
Orin Kerr shared three final thoughts to consider before Tuesday’s oral arguments in the case. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 3:12 pm by Victoria Clark
” Orin Kerr shared the 2018 case supplement to “Computer Crime Law, 4th Edition. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm by Aileen McColgan, Matrix.
Lord Phillips reiterated, as [58], that “the HRA does not have retroactive effect”, also that its interpretation ought to mirror that of the Convention. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am by Anita Davies
Lord Kerr’s answer to both questions was a firm no. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 am by Laura Sandwell
On Tuesday 22 November is the appeal from the Court of Session (Scotland) of Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Ltd, which will be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Brown, Mance and Kerr. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:05 am by Chris Stott, Pannone LLP
On 5th May, a seven Justice Supreme Court, comprising Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke and, reflecting, coincidentally, the changes confirmed earlier this week, Lord Collins (who will shortly retire) and Lord Justice Wilson (who, on this occasion will sit as an acting Justice but who will be sworn in as a full time Justice on 26th May), will consider this issue in the case of R v Waya [2010] EWCA Crim 412. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm by Blog Editorial
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by a 4-3 majority (Hale, Kerr and Phillips dissenting). [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:08 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers
These appeals from the Court of Appeal (Civ) will be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Brown, Mance and Kerr. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:18 am by Catherine Rose
Catherine is a paralegal at David Phillips & Partners, working in criminal defence. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:08 am by Laura Sandwell
It is for Lords Phillips, Brown and Kerr to determine whether there is an automatic right to appeal. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:47 am by Laura Sandwell
From Monday 23 until Tuesday 24 July 2012 is the appeal of The Catholic Child Welfare Society & Ors v Various claimants & Ors, to be heard by L Phillips, L Hale, L Kerr, L Wilson, and L Carnwath. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:48 am by Laura Sandwell
This appeal from the Court of Appeal (Civ) will be heard by Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Clarke and Sumption and concerns the respondent chartering a vessel from the appellant owners and missing the hire payment, resulting in the vessel being withdrawn whilst laden with cargo. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
The seven-judge bench, consisting of Lord Phillips, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Dyson, unanimously dismissed both appeals and upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal that the Fairchild exception to the conventional rule on causation, which applies in “multiple exposure” mesothelioma cases (that is, where the claimant has contracted mesothelioma after being wrongly exposed to asbestos by several defendants) also applies to… [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am by Blog Editorial
This will be heard by Lords Phillips, Mance, Kerr, Clarke and Wilson on Wednesday 27 July 2011. [read post]