Search for: "Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma" Results 61 - 80 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2013, 6:25 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
The Massachusetts court’s determination that a ZIP code constitutes personal identification information is similar to the determination in Pineda v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:25 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
The Massachusetts court’s determination that a ZIP code constitutes personal identification information is similar to the determination in Pineda v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by Brendon Tavelli
” The plaintiff argued, as the California Supreme Court held in Pineda v Williams Sonoma, that “address” meant each and every component of an address. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 8:28 pm by Sara Alexandre
The California Supreme Court in Pineda v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 1:30 pm by Craig Hoffman
Williams-Sonoma finding that a ZIP code constitutes “personal identification information. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Kevin
However, invariably judges will be asked to interpret these regulations - and as a recent California court case shows, their decisions may be unsettling.In Pineda v. [read post]