Search for: "Place Properties, L.P. " Results 81 - 100 of 213
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P., No. 16-489 (Reopening final decision under R.60). [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:02 am by Steven Boutwell
The evidence produced in this case demonstrated that the Avondale Ring Canal was a manmade drainage canal on private property. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm by Dennis Crouch
Section 101 creates a “patent-free zone” and places within it the indispensable instruments of social, economic, and scientific endeavor. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
, No. 16-296 (OxyContin patent – when is an element ‘inherently’ disclosed by the prior art for anticipation purposes) Obviousness: Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by John Elwood
  The walls of deference are high and hard to climb, and the place death, considering who thou art, respondent. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 8:51 am by Don Cruse
The case now set for oral argument on March 29th is CROSSTEX NORTH TEXAS PIPELINE, L.P., N/K/A ENLINK NORTH TEXAS PIPELINE, LP v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:13 am by MBettman
Green of Beachwood, L.P., 2015-Ohio-1193 (The purpose of punitive damages is not to compensate a plaintiff, but to punish and deter certain conduct, quoting Moskovitz v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Monterey Park (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 394 [voter-approved ballot measure was funding mechanism or fiscal activity, not commitment to specific project with potential environmental impacts]; Cedar Fair, L.P. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 7:24 am by MBettman
Green of Beachwood, L.P., 2015-Ohio-1193 (The purpose of punitive damages is not to compensate a plaintiff, but to punish and deter certain conduct, quoting Moskovitz v. [read post]