Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 81 - 100 of 178,003
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2021, 5:46 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
On the day of the accident, plaintiffs medical records showed that he “complained of pain in his left knee, neck/back, and the left side of his face. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago has affirmed the grant of defendant’s motion for summary judgment in the plaintiffs lawsuit that alleged that the product Testim, which was manufactured by Auxilium Pharmaceuticals as a topical gel containing testosterone, caused the plaintiff, Isaac Owens, to develop deep vein thrombosis (DVT). [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago has affirmed the grant of defendant’s motion for summary judgment in the plaintiffs lawsuit that alleged that the product Testim, which was manufactured by Auxilium Pharmaceuticals as a topical gel containing testosterone, caused the plaintiff, Isaac Owens, to develop deep vein thrombosis (DVT). [read post]
21 May 2013, 10:24 am by Michelle Yeary
  So, the court quoted from its first decision dismissing plaintiffs claims. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 1:59 pm by Gallivan & Gallivan
Because the opinion of the plaintiffs medical expert’s conflicted with that of the defendant’s medical expert, summary judgment on whether the plaintiff experienced permanent or significant limitation of her spine was not proper. [read post]
24 May 2021, 11:09 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Every plaintiff's lawyer who deals with a motion to dismiss under Rule 12 must review Littlejohn. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:36 am by Patrick G. Lee
It’s the sort of news that few plaintiffs want to hear: their personal-injury claims must be filed in a foreign court, not the U.S., the capital of tort litigation. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 5:10 am by Bill
Naturally if the defense comes into possession of a plaintiff's Facebook statements those statements must be exchanged-- in fact, this is the practice we have followed. [read post]
9 May 2019, 12:53 pm by Neumann Law Group
Ultimately, the court concluded that there was no misconduct, dismissing the plaintiffs appeal. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:29 am by Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment that it did not infringe plaintiff's media streaming patent in light of plaintiff's statements during inter partes review. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 7:49 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" While plaintiff explained that she understood HR's inquiry to be asking whether she had reported the sexist comments to her store manager, the Court of Appeals is not buying it, deeming plaintiff's explanation "hardly plausible. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:05 am by The Docket Navigator
The court rejected plaintiff's argument that attorneys' fees should be awarded only for plaintiff's efforts in obtaining the previously withheld documents and instead awarded fees for all litigation activity from the date the documents should have been produced to final judgment. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 9:09 am by Allison Gomez
The defendant is the at-fault party who has allegedly caused the plaintiffs injuries. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 10:53 am
And our 2018 Georgia Plaintiff's Attorney of the Year earned the honor by leading wins in two of those trials, including an eight-figure verdict against MARTA. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 2:20 pm
It was shown in the Plaintiff's case in chief that Schwaller, who died in 2003, did not have a history of heart attacks, strokes or other symptoms of congestive heart disease prior to her use of Merck & Co.'s Vioxx. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:00 am by Bonnie Park
A recent case from the First Circuit Federal Court of Appeals demonstrates that an overly-aggressive copyright infringement plaintiff may find itself paying not only his own attorney’s fees, but also the defendant’s. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 8:24 am by John Jascob
On appeal, the plaintiff argued that an insider’s failure to disclose material facts when trading in the corporation’s stock is an omission under Rule 10b-5(b) and that the jury instructions should have reflected this. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 10:15 am
To the extent the evidence was relevant to Winfred’s credibility, it was more prejudicial than probative. ... [read post]