Search for: "Plaintiff(s) v. Defendant(s)"
Results 21 - 40
of 69,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2018, 6:44 am
The court denied defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's willful patent infringement claims for failing to sufficiently allege egregious behavior. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 9:53 am
Flanagan v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:07 pm
First, defendant successfully opposed plaintiff's argument that defendant had not established diverse citizenship. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:18 pm
Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 7:27 am
The court granted plaintiff's motion to disqualify plaintiff's former officer/lead inventor of the patents-in-suit from consulting with defendant on non-confidential matters. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 10:08 am
Tenenbaum, the RIAA has asked the Court to deny defendant's motion to compel plaintiffs to respond to the outstanding interrogatories. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:40 am
” In Bell v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
The Plaintiff admitted that she only saw the defendant's vehicle a split second before the impact. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 5:07 am
This defendant's in hot water.The First Department denied a motion to dismiss in an action seeking damages for injuries allegedly suffered when a glass shower door fell on plaintiff at defendant's hotel, in Higgins-Barber v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 6:03 am
In Cryer v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 5:23 am
As discussed here, plaintiff asserted that the defendants—a group home and it’s individual owner—were not entitled to exclude any time within plaintiff’s scheduled shifts, because plaintiff did not reside on defendants’ premises for an “extended period of time” as defined by the C.F.R. regulations applicable to the situation. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 2:25 pm
The plaintiffs in Holdgrafer v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
He contended that the device would have “recorded data regarding the plaintiff's speed and location before and at the time of the accident, which, under the particular circumstances presented, was relevant to the plaintiff's contention that the defendant driver was negligent in the operation of his vehicle. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 7:01 pm
The defendants have filed their reply to the plaintiff’s opposition to the defendants’ motion to dismiss in Martin v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 7:46 am
Plaintiff appealed to the intermediary court of appeals, and this court affirmed trial court’s dismissal of the case against defendants. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:23 am
Fund Corp., the First Department found that the plaintiff's employer functioned as one company with defendant for purposes of barring plaintiff's claims under Workers' Compensation Law 11. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 2:24 pm
If the defendant carries its burden, then the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant’s proffered reason was merely pretext for unlawful discrimination. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:05 pm
In Gulbrandsen the trial judge, in reasons indexed at 2013 BCSC 959, initially awarded the plaintiff costs up to the date of the defendant’s offer to settle, and double costs to the defendant thereafter. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:46 am
Defendant's motion to compel plaintiff to produce its settlement agreements with two other defendants in this case was granted. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 8:51 pm
Further, the Government Defendants distort the significance of the Supreme Court’s groundbreaking decision in Riley v. [read post]