Search for: "Plaintiff(s) v. Defendant(s)"
Results 81 - 100
of 69,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2014, 10:00 pm
In Procaps S.A. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 7:54 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:04 am
The court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on defendant's unclean hands defense. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
In the case of T.D.A.P. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 7:30 am
The court granted in part defendant's requested attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:06 pm
The court’s basic response is that the plaintiff can continue to sue these defendants if it chooses. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 7:44 am
The RIAA has filed a response disputing the defendant's objection to the Magistrate's order granting plaintiffs' motion for a protective order preventing defendant's lawyers from having copies of the RIAA's agreements with MediaSentry, in UMG v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 5:33 am
” In Vaughn v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 11:55 pm
AGC Capital Securities v Jaijaifu Modern Agriculture (HK) Limited [2019] NSWSC 62, a case decided by NSW Supreme Court in 2019 provides a test to determine a plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed when no appearance by defendant. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 2:46 pm
Velasquez v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
Here's another case in which a plaintiff forfeited his right to punitive damages because he failed to present meaningful evidence of the defendant's financial condition.The plaintiff won a verdict for $288,000 in compensatory damages and $160,000 in punitive damages. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:29 am
The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment that it did not infringe plaintiff's media streaming patent in light of plaintiff's statements during inter partes review. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Sutcliffe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 12:00 am
In Stoddard v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:15 pm
Tenenbaum, defendant has filed a brief in opposition to the plaintiffs' request for an injunction. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 10:00 pm
Plaintiff sued some unknown defendants for breach of contract and violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, based on the defendants’ deceptive conduct that tricked some internet users into signing up for plaintiff’s paid services. [read post]
3 Aug 2006, 6:11 pm
Defendants had argued that plaintiff's consultant... [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:50 am
” In Hayward v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 9:54 am
Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. [read post]