Search for: "Planning Board of the Town of Chester" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
There was no plan to remove the remains of the deceased, nor to disturb them any further than was essential for the purpose of obtaining the jewellery. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
  Municipal Audits Town of Charlton – Procurement (2022M-5)  Town officials did not always seek competition when procuring goods and services. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
  Municipal Audits Town of Charlton – Procurement (2022M-5)  Town officials did not always seek competition when procuring goods and services. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Also the board did not adopt a multiyear financial and capital plan or a detailed reserve plan that included the need and optimal funding level for each reserve.Town of Mooers – Highway Asset Accountability (Clinton County) The highway superintendent did not maintain a complete and up-to-date inventory of department assets. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Also the board did not adopt a multiyear financial and capital plan or a detailed reserve plan that included the need and optimal funding level for each reserve.Town of Mooers – Highway Asset Accountability (Clinton County) The highway superintendent did not maintain a complete and up-to-date inventory of department assets. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 9:36 pm by Patricia Salkin
  At that time, the property was located partially in the Town of Chester and partially in the Village. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 2:30 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
I plan to add some commentary, including input from readers who are at the polls today. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:36 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Plaintiff’s property had been annexed from the Town of Chester to the Village of Chester. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:36 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Plaintiff’s property had been annexed from the Town of Chester to the Village of Chester. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:25 am by Patricia Salkin
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the respondent Town of Chester Planning Board to dismiss the petition. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 5:24 pm by Patricia Salkin
” The Village Board began processing the RM-N zoning designation and provided the proposal to the Village of Chester Planning Board for review and comment; however, the Planning Board issued a report opposing RM-N zoning and suggested that the project “could be built as planned under the existing RM multi-residential zoning. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:41 pm by Patricia Salkin
” The Village Board began processing the RM-N zoning designation and provided the proposal to the Village of Chester Planning Board for review and comment; however, the Planning Board issued a report opposing RM-N zoning and suggested that the project “could be built as planned under the existing RM multi-residential zoning. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 11:13 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
…..before the comments start flooding in) Offensive comments in Chester Prize for the most stupid, politically correct news story this week goes to Chester’s local councillors complaining loudly about what they termed “Offensive letting agent sign boards” What exactly did they proclaim? [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 6:47 pm by Patricia Salkin
Town of Chester. 752 F.3d 554 (2d Cir.2014), the finality requirement should not apply because the City had behaved badly throughout the permit process. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 6:47 pm by Patricia Salkin
Town of Chester. 752 F.3d 554 (2d Cir.2014), the finality requirement should not apply because the City had behaved badly throughout the permit process. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 11:08 am by David Bilinsky
According to Simon Chester, a mutual friend of Milt, “The extraordinary thing about Milt was that this pioneer sprang from Orillia – small town Ontario. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 3:01 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Since the Town of Chester and the Planning Board of the Town of Blooming Grove, as co-lead agencies of the Mountco project, had already issued a positive declaration, the County was prohibited from issuing a subsequent determination (see 6 NYCRR 617.6[b][3][iii]; Matter of Gordon v Rush, 299 AD2d 20, 29, affd 100 NY2d 236; Matter of Incorporated Vil. of Poquott v Cahill, 11 AD3d 536, 542)." [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 1:04 pm by admin
Curtis, who is 68 and lives in the house with his Siamese cat, Butch, plans to spen [read post]