Search for: "Points v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 41 - 60
of 376
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
The Commission is a securities regulator without statutory authority or expertise to address political and social issues. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
Commissioner of Social Security, which the Supreme Court decided in April. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:23 pm
In EPF Commissioner v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:42 am
It was an integral part of the move to combine tax allowances and social security benefits into a seamless tax credit system [30]. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm
The experience of Anthem, Inc. illustrates this point. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Such legislation would almost certainly pass constitutional muster: Under South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
R (Moos and Anor) v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2011] EWHC 957 (Admin) – Read Judgment The High Court has decided that the actions of police in “kettling” climate change protestors during the G20 summit were unlawful. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Asking for more data points, requiring them in an aggressive timeframe, or demanding them in a particular form might be costly to market participants, but the Commission—enthused by the prospect of real-time, granular data at no cost to itself—is unlikely to carefully balance the real costs against the perceived benefits. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 12:42 pm
Mr Perdios, relying on the decision of Social Security Commissioner Mark Rowland in CH3314/2005, found that Mrs Amin’s work did not provide enough income to cover what he considered to be her ‘reasonable living expenses’. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 12:42 pm
Mr Perdios, relying on the decision of Social Security Commissioner Mark Rowland in CH3314/2005, found that Mrs Amin’s work did not provide enough income to cover what he considered to be her ‘reasonable living expenses’. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm
Dec. 31. 2014), the plaintiffs took issue with documents that had been produced in discovery that contained the plaintiffs' social security numbers, claiming that the mailing of these documents violated a Michigan state law against transmitting full social security numbers through the mail. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
Mr Carey secured substantial damages, believed to be some €250,000, and his legal costs. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am
See also pages 30-32 of the brief for former INS commissioners.) [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:00 am
By the late 1980s, the situation had come to the point where “retirement injuries”, i.e., small incidents, were filed as comp claims and used as the basis, years later, for reopening the claim and receiving substantial tax-free supplements to retirement and Social Security payments. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
Conclusion The potential impact of any judgment of the CJEU on the exportability of these benefits, and its interpretation by the Supreme Court remains to be seen, but it is another case raising the pertinent issue of free movement and social security in Europe (see the recent CJEU judgment in Jobcenter Berlin Neukölln v Nazifa, Sonita, Valentina and Valentino Alimanovic (C-67/14). [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm
They argue that each of these four factors points toward upholding the Texas law. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:33 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union has produced a landmark decision in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (C‑362/14). [read post]
