Search for: "Polymers International Limited" Results 41 - 60 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2012, 5:45 pm by Lawrence Higgins
Sign up here: [Link] The C5's 11th Annual International Conference on Maximising Pharma Patent Lifec [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Further to our December 19, 2011 post, the International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) on December 29, 2011, issued the public version of its opinion finding a violation of Section 337 and modifying the June 17, 2011 final Initial Determination (“ID”) issued by ALJ Carl C. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,405,704 entitled INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE WITH LIMITED TEMPERATURE CYCLE and owned by Kruse. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,405,704 entitled INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE WITH LIMITED TEMPERATURE CYCLE and owned by Kruse. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am by Marie Louise
(IP Think Tank) Fulbright report still confident on patent litigation trends (PatLit) Despite what some might say – patent litigation is very much a minority sport (IAM) WIPO members search for a negotiating agenda on patent law (IP Watch) Patents in cosmetics: Disclosure of origin arduous, report says (IP Watch) WIPO Patent Committee Chair’s text shows possible future work (IP Watch) WIPO returns to substantive patent law talks after 5 years, with balance (IP Watch) KEI general… [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:49 pm by Robert Oszakiewski
These errors substantially delayed the availability of the IUR information to both internal EPA programs, such as the Existing Chemicals Program, and the public. . . . [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 1:29 pm
An aside as to case law unwritten about international offers to sell as infringing. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 1:30 pm
Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH v Commissioner of Patents [2001] FCA 647 and Prejay Holdings Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2003] FCAFC 77 applied. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 2:30 pm
However, CPSC did note that the acrylic polymer layers of a CD or DVD are not subject to the lead paint standard because those layers are not a "coating," and noted further that "[i]f the internal metallic layer of a disk is not accessible to a child, testing and certification would not be required" to demonstrate compliance with the lead content standard. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
The indictment charged Peters with making, and causing to be made and presented, false claims to the Internal Revenue Service in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 7:01 am
Cir., 2007), rejecting counsel's reliance on Akron Polymer Container Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 3:36 pm
Full Text of TXU Press Release On Firm Being Taken Private February 26, 2007 9:38 a.m. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 7:03 pm
If, however, MIBK had been added to adjust the stability of the suspending medium or prevent agglomeration of polymer, it may not have been an impurity and therefore EEI would most likely not infringe. [read post]