Search for: "Power v. Bankruptcy Court" Results 41 - 60 of 1,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2015, 11:00 am by Above the Law
Marshall, the Supreme Court stunned many observers by re-visiting separation of powers issues regarding the jurisdiction of the United States bankruptcy courts that most legal scholars had viewed as long settled [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:16 am by The Federalist Society
On January 14, 2015, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inWellness Int’l Network, Limited v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:37 am by Ronald Mann
ShareThe Supreme Court heard a confusing and wide-ranging discourse yesterday in MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 10:40 am by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Monday in one of the highest-profile bankruptcies in recent memory: Harrington v. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 7:32 am by Christie D. Arkovich, P.A.
The Bankruptcy Court ruled that an arbitration clause did not constrain the court’s contempt powers, “[w]ords in a consumer agreement cannot deprive the bankruptcy court of the inherent power to enforce compliance with an injunction. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Bailey (08-307), on a bankruptcy court's power to bar related lawsuits. [read post]
31 May 2015, 12:55 pm by Richard M. Re
Last week, the Supreme Court issued Wellness International Network v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:10 am by Bob Lawless
Arkison about the scope of the bankruptcy court's powers in the wake of the Court's ruling in Stern v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm
 The Bankruptcy Court may confirm the plan even if all classes of creditors reject it. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:18 pm by Yale Law Journal
In Standing on Hot Air: American Electric Power and the Bankruptcy of Standing Doctrine, Professor Daniel Farber argues that AEP is “a powerful illustration of the deep flaws” in the Court’s Article III standing jurisprudence. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:39 am by Stephen Z. Starr
Spell (In re Spell), 650 F.2d 375, 377 (2d Cir. 1981); it is hereby                   ORDERED that pursuant to the power of this Court under 11 U.S.C. [read post]