Search for: "Precision Franchising LLC " Results 21 - 40 of 43
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2017, 8:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
But other times, the franchisee simply ends the relationship and starts a completely separate business in the same territory.A district court in Nebraska confronted precisely this type of fact-setting in Colorado Security Consultants, LLC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:47 am by Ron Coleman
 More precisely, it never was a trademark, and nothing anyone can do could ever make it a trademark. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 10:57 am by Matthew Odgers
Furthermore, your LLC must file a state tax return with the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) every year (even if it did not conduct any business that particular year). [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:51 am
Procter & Gamble Distributors, LLC, 766 F.3d 1296 (11th Cir. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:31 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Their lawyers strive to provide every client with an efficient, precisely targeted legal solution designed to protect and promote the client’s interests. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:26 pm
Precision Franchising, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company based in Leesburg, licenses the Precision Tune Auto Care system. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 12:45 pm
Precision Franchising LLC, a Virginia company, licenses an automobile service system and owns several associated trademarks. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:26 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
Under the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act (“Act”), N.J.S.A. 56:10-1 et seq., a franchisor cannot terminate a franchise without good cause. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:59 pm
Acceleron LLC, 587 F.3d 1358, 1362 (Fed. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 8:56 pm by Todd B. Scherwin
 In Collins, the employer, Gee West Seattle LLC (“Gee West”), operated several automobile franchises. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Catignani, 7 S.W.2d 38, 39-40 (Tenn. 1928)]; Sholodge Franchise Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:50 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
  The Court acknowledged that no party argued that DGCL Section 141(d) or the Airgas Charter required that the three-year terms be measured with mathematical precision. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
Automotive Franchise Corp., No. 87-180-II, 1987 WL 18967, at *9 (Tenn. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am by Beth Graham
  Introduction Part I of this series (here) was published the day before the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
  They include: Paul Green School of Rock Music Franchising, LLC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 10:15 pm by J.W. Verret
 I then consider how they will fare under the scrutiny of the Blasius line of cases in Delaware protecting the shareholder franchise. [read post]