Search for: "Premier Dealer Services, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2015, 12:01 pm
They used a Staten Island-based company, Premier Links, Inc., as an unregistered broker dealer from 2006-2012. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:42 am by Peter Steinmeyer
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 2013 IL App (1st) 120327, that, absent other consideration, two years of employment is required for a restrictive covenant to be deemed supported by adequate consideration—even where the employee signed the restrictive covenant as a condition to his employment offer and even where the employee voluntarily resigned. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:42 am by Peter (Pete) A. Steinmeyer
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 2013 IL App (1st) 120327, that, absent other consideration, two years of employment is required for a restrictive covenant to be deemed supported by adequate consideration—even where the employee signed the restrictive covenant as a condition to his employment offer and even where the employee voluntarily resigned. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:33 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Premier Dealer Services, an Illinois appellate case that seemed to legislate a bright-line, two-year rule for employment serving as consideration for at-will employees' non-compete agreements. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:40 am by nedaj
  The Delegating CPO seeking registration relief through the streamlined approach must submit a request to the CFTC’s Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight using the forms attached to the no-action letter. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:59 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Premier Dealer Services, Inc. had received in Illinois federal courts, which is set forth in my March 6 post "Fifield, Federal Style. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Premier Dealer Services, 993 N.E.2d 938 (2013), in which an Illinois appellate court invalidated a noncompete clause for lack of mutual consideration. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Premier Dealer Services, which altered the landscape of noncompete law in Illinois by seemingly declaring a bright-line rule that an employee must have worked for his or her employer for two years in order for the employer to subsequently enforce a noncompete clause. [read post]