Search for: "Premier Holdings LLC" Results 41 - 60 of 168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2019, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Connecticut Fine Wine and Spirits, LLC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Nat’l Geographic Partners, LLC, 2019 WL 3935180, No. 18-cv-3127-WJM-SKC (D. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The FEC stalemated in a vote over whether to issue a more severe fine, one that would hold him personally liable. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Canada The National Post reports that one of Ontario’s highest-ranking police officers is threatening to sue Premier Doug Ford accusing him of defamation by accusing the officer of breaking the Police Services Act. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The representative claimant in the case of Lloyd v Google LLC has been granted permission to appeal by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
In Singapore, Fox and the Premier League joined telcos Singtel and StarHub in a private case against two Android set-top box sellers for allegedly ‘wilfully infringing’ copyright. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 5:53 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
The presenters included Matt Tait of UT-Austin; Stefan Savage of UC-San Diego; Mayank Varia of Boston University; and Ernie Brickell of Brickell Cryptology, LLC. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
IPKat has a post on the extension of a live blocking order in favour of the Football Association Premier League. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 10:35 am by Chris Manes
  ________________________ Sanger & Manes LLP is the premier law firm in California residency tax planning, consultations, audits and appeals. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 10:35 am by Chris Manes
  ________________________ Sanger & Manes LLP is the premier law firm in California residency tax planning, consultations, audits and appeals. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:29 am by Danielle C. Quinn, Stephen P. Younger
In Duncan-Watt, the Commercial Division ruled on Defendants’ motion to dismiss by holding that the dispute resolution clause in the parties’ licensing agreement failed to select Australian courts as the exclusive forum in which to litigate any disputes. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:01 pm by Mark Walsh
” (Deck went on to hold that the Constitution bars the use of visible shackles in the penalty phase of a capital trial, absent a special interest.) [read post]