Search for: "Price v. Attorney General of Kansas"
Results 41 - 60
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Canada (Attorney General), [2005] 1 SCR 533 It is well understood that in Canada the grant of a patent is akin to a contract or bargain between the patentee on the one hand and the government of Canada (representing the interests of the general public) on the other. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:19 pm
Rivera v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:11 am
District Court for the District of Kansas said May 24. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
The supporting briefs for both sides in Trump v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:54 am
In May, Judge O’Connor granted a Motion to Intervene filed by seventeen Democratic attorney generals from sixteen states[2] and the District of Columbia. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:08 am
See Swann v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am
Circuit Court of Appeals opinion from 1969, Community Blood Bank of Kansas City Area, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:36 am
The Court heard arguments in Connick v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Some have never sought recognition because their university has not offered it; others have chosen to give up the various benefits of recognition as the price of avoiding heavy-handed university regulation. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
The former senator recently talked with the Current and Penn Law about having grown up in the same small Kansas town as retired Senator Bob Dole, his days as a Penn undergrad, his entry into politics and what he hopes to impart to a new generation of lawyers. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 3:22 am
See Kansas v. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
It also created a council in cooperation with state attorneys general to probe allegations of censorship based on political views. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 4:04 pm
Yes the Supreme Court’s NFIB v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
" Finally, I read the Declaration of Robert Spitzer, which is Exhibit E of the California Attorney General's Supplemental Brief in Response to the Court's Order of September, 26, 2022, Duncan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
“Direct means Direct” generally limits coverage to losses of assets that the insured held in an account for a customer or owned by the insured. [2] In Cumberland & Erly, LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 10:16 am
Kahle from 2006 as the plaintiff in Kahle v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
The complaint alleges that as a result the share price in the offering was inflated. [read post]
