Search for: "Price v. HHS"
Results 81 - 100
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm
See HH Judge Parkes QC in Donovan v Gibbons [2014] EWHC 3406 (QB) at [6] and Warby J in Ames v Spamhaus Project Ltd [2015] EWHC 127 (QB) at [55]: “….there may be circumstances in which one would naturally expect to see tangible evidence that a statement had caused harm to reputation, but as practitioners in this field are well aware, it is generally impractical for a claimant to seek out witnesses to say that they read the words complained of and thought the… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
Burwell and Wheaton College v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 12:10 pm
In King v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 11:29 am
See e.g., Pfeil v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(v) Payments received as compensation for the wrongful death of a person upon whom the judgment debtor was dependent at the time of the wrongful death, to the extent reasonably necessary for the support of the judgment debtor and any dependent of the judgment debtor. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(v) Payments received as compensation for the wrongful death of a person upon whom the judgment debtor was dependent at the time of the wrongful death, to the extent reasonably necessary for the support of the judgment debtor and any dependent of the judgment debtor. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 7:10 am
Dudenhoeffer and Burwell v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 4:04 pm
Yes the Supreme Court’s NFIB v. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:30 pm
HHS. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
But even for more well-to-do employees, the cost of health insurance on the exchanges will be considerably less than what the market price would be in the absence of the ACA.) [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm
Notably, a relatively low price would also arguably assuage worry about undue inducement at the expense of creating a new worry about exploitation of providers paid offensively low wages. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 10:03 pm
(Indeed, you are required by law to get it—or perhaps not exactly required, see NFIB v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm
Last summer, the Supreme Court put its money where its mouth was in terms of federalism doctrine in its landmark decision about the Affordable Care Act (ACA), in NFIB v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:43 pm
See Solis v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
One of the central policy issues injected into the current case of AMP v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 4:27 pm
Distributions are not made in proportion to ownership interest, or physician-owners pay different prices for their ownership interests, because of the expected or actual volume or value of devices used by the physicians. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm
Elrod; articles by Margaret “Pegi” Price, Micah H. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:21 pm
EPA v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:27 pm
Circuit also reversed the lower court and remanded a decision of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in Friedman v. [read post]
