Search for: "Price v. Myers"
Results 41 - 60
of 155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2019, 6:59 am
Last but not least, we get an opinion in an ACCA case, Myers v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 11:16 am
That would be last month's decision in Myers-Armstrong v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
In Mallory v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 1:49 pm
Miami Herald v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
Payne v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 10:55 am
The cases of Bristol-Myers Squibb v Paranova and Boehringer II in particular held that where a parallel importer re-packages goods, the following conditions must be satisfied to prevent infringement: The repacking must be objectively necessary to avoid market partitioning; The condition of the product must not be effected; The manufacturer and the importer must be clearly identified; The reputation of the mark and its owner must not be damaged; and The importer must give notice to… [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 12:37 am
General Global pharmaceutical linkage regulations: A consortium framework (IP Osgoode) Pfizer rolling out generics to grab off-patent market (GenericsWeb) Australia: Too little too late: CSL Limited v Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (No 2) and the judicial discretion to amend a patent (IP Whiteboard) Brazil: You lost your chance! [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 12:00 pm
DiMattia et al. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 4:59 am
One justice dissented on the basis that the board already knew the CEO would likely get a pay raise and the details of a secret presentation about the pay proposal did not add anything material (City of Fort Myers General Employees’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Tubach, Moderator, O’Melveny & Myers LLP Martha Boersch, Jones Day Craig C. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:02 am
Myers v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:04 am
It looks like they would also do away with all the problems of the “threshold” requirement introduced by Phillips v Mirabella (the nature of the problem is laid out at paragraphs 19 to 27 of Bristol-Myers Squibb v Faulding). [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
See Denton v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:00 pm
Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co., 295 F.2d 292 (1961); Lartigue v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:19 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
See also Cupek v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Finally, the Reese court invoked “important policy concerns” that weighed against allowing common-law claims asserting liability for failure to recall a legally-marketed product: Because the cost of locating, recalling, and replacing mass-marketed products can be enormous and will likely be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices, the recall power should not be exercised without extensive consideration of its economic impact. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Finally, the Reese court invoked “important policy concerns” that weighed against allowing common-law claims asserting liability for failure to recall a legally-marketed product: Because the cost of locating, recalling, and replacing mass-marketed products can be enormous and will likely be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices, the recall power should not be exercised without extensive consideration of its economic impact. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Finally, the Reese court invoked “important policy concerns” that weighed against allowing common-law claims asserting liability for failure to recall a legally-marketed product: Because the cost of locating, recalling, and replacing mass-marketed products can be enormous and will likely be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices, the recall power should not be exercised without extensive consideration of its economic impact. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:14 pm
Wholesale Price Litig., Case No. 08-11200-PBS, 2013 WL 2420912 (D. [read post]
