Search for: "Price v. No Defendants Named" Results 61 - 80 of 2,328
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Second Circuit reverses and remands an order of restitution, imposed under the Mandatory Victim’s Restitution Act of 1996 (“MVRA”) — 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(a)(2), (c) — because the Government failed to prove, by a preponderance, the proximate cause element: i.e., that the losses to the victims were foreseeable to the defendant in the course of committing the “offense of conviction.” United States v. Goodrich, No. 19-208, __F.4th__ , 2021 WL 3889801 (2d Cir. Sept. 1, 2021) (C.J.J. Calabresi, Pooler, Carney).
13 Sep 2021, 10:57 am by Darrell Fields
Goodrich executed fraudulent trades with co-defendants to artificially inflate the share price of a sham company named, Cubed, Inc. [read post]
Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/
SEC roasts reggae coffee company schemer for $58 million
9 Oct 2017, 1:48 pm by John Jascob
Weaver, of the U.K. and Canada, is the last defendant in this action against whom a judgment has been obtained (SEC v. [read post]
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation - http://jimhamiltonblog.blogspot.com/
ERISA-Sixth Circuit Rules That Plaintiffs Must Show A Net Loss To Bring A Stock-Drop Case
11 Jun 2012, 6:49 am by Stanley D. Baum
The named defendants were KeyCorp ("Key") and numerous individually named fiduciaries of the Plan (the "defendants"). [read post]
ERISA Lawyer Blog - http://www.erisalawyerblog.com/
The Price at the Pump
21 Oct 2011, 7:24 am by Daniel Richardson
By Cara CooksonBradford Oil Company, Inc. v. [read post]
Supreme Court of Vermont Law Blog - http://scovlegal.blogspot.com/
Think Keyword Metatags Are Dead? They Are (Except in Court)–Reflex v. Luxy
14 Sep 2021, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
Defendant’s intent. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Northern District of California Decertifies Class Under Comcast Due to Inadequacy of Damages Model
28 Sep 2022, 10:23 am by Charles W. Niemann and Jonathan W. Garlough
In Freitas v. [read post]
Consumer Class Defense Counsel - https://www.foley.com/en/insights/blogs/consumer-class-defense-counsel
Case Law: Peter Andre v Katie Price – honest comment and the public interest – Gervase de Wilde
13 Jan 2012, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
He referred to the speech of Lord Nicholls in Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] E.M.L.R. 31. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - http://inforrm.wordpress.com
Summary 2010 WY 42
8 Apr 2010, 10:28 am by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued April 8, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Eres v. [read post]
Law Library Letter - http://wyolawlibrary.blogspot.com/
retail/outlet claims for Vineyard Vines scrape past motion to dismiss
23 Sep 2021, 10:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Casio v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Restitution available for false discounts even if goods were ok
9 Apr 2015, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Spann v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Selling Top Fashion at Low Prices Comes with Its Own Price to Pay … in the Courts
15 Aug 2021, 1:32 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
 Lubin Austermuehle  track record includes the fact that the firm obtained a $40 million settlement in the Erikson v. [read post]
Chicago Business Litigation Lawyer Blog - http://www.chicagobusinesslitigationlawyerblog.com/
Summary 2008 WY 142
8 Dec 2008, 11:03 am
Price, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Defendant): Diane M. [read post]
Law Library Letter - http://wyolawlibrary.blogspot.com/
K-V Pharmaceuticals Calls Upon the ITC To Defend Its Makena® Brand
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Lisa Salazar
K-V named 7 Chinese manufacturers, 3 domestic distributors and 36 compounders, as Proposed Respondents but their request for relief applies much more broadly. [read post]
The Brand Protection Blog - http://fulbrightbrandprotection.blogspot.com/
Defendant is Charged with Multiple Counts of Attempted Identity Theft
23 Oct 2014, 4:17 pm
Rather, the Court holds that even crediting Defendant's testimony, for the purposes of argument, that wife knew about the Dell account and gave Defendant permission to place the orders in his name, that authority terminated as a matter of law when Defendant, by her own testimony, threw the wife out of the house, and commenced a Family Court proceeding against V. [read post]
New York Criminal Lawyer Blog - http://www.newyorkcriminallawyer24-7blog.com/
Paying Some Price for Gamesmanship
12 Sep 2013, 2:00 pm
  Grote v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
What is a "rescue" dog? Jury will have to decide
17 Feb 2023, 5:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
PetConnect Rescue, Inc. v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Legal Intelligencer: Collective David Against Corporate Goliaths: Named Plaintiffs’ Standing in Antitrust Class Actions
26 Jan 2024, 10:49 am by Edward T. Kang
See Fox v. [read post]
Kang Haggerty Firm News. - https://www.khflaw.com/news/
Class Action Defense Cases–Starr v. Sony BMG: Second Circuit Reverses Dismissal Of Antitrust Class Action Holding Class Action Complaint’s Allegations Satisfied Twombly
25 Jan 2010, 8:07 pm
” Starr v. [read post]
Class Action Defense Blog - https://www.reallaw.us/posts/
Selling Corporation Lacked Standing to Make Post-Merger Claim for Selling Shareholders
13 Apr 2009, 5:44 pm
HLSP Holdings Corp. v. [read post]
Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog - http://www.delawarelitigation.com/
Intelligent Digital Systems, LLC v. Visual Management Systems, Inc.: Seller’s Choice of Payment in the Form of Fixed Stock Conversion Ruled Not a Security
21 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Andrew Podore
  VMS defaulted and IDS filed suit, naming VMS, its CEO, and its Board as defendants. [read post]
The Race to the Bottom - http://www.theracetothebottom.org/home/