Search for: "Price v. State of Kansas et al"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2022, 6:03 am
Given the high level of taxation on tobacco products—on average, excise taxes alone make up 40 percent of the retail price—a menthol prohibition will assuredly reduce revenues both for federal and state governments, while it is less likely that the policy will yield significant benefits in terms of smoking cessation. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
More focused arbitration – covering price-adjustment clauses – is common even in the largest private target bids. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
The BroadbandUSA Newsletter for September includes notable state news from Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, Kentucky, and Kansas (among others). [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Monopolies are associated in the public mind with higher prices. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
In an earlier survey of 3,999 persons in California, 3.2% reported drinking raw milk (Headrick et al, 1997). [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
Sachs, Kansas State University Devine, Dennis J. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Holland 1916, Inc., of 1340 Burlington Street, North Kansas City, Mo., failed to file the disclosure reports with state and federal authorities for the calendar years 2006, 2007 and 2008, according to a consent agreement and final order filed in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:20 am
Shout outs to the folks from Thomson Reuters, Dorsey & Whitney, Merrill, Kroll, Socha/Gelbmann, Jersey Girl, Laverne & Linda, et al! [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
Increasingly, however, the state is struggling. [read post]